2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00793.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global music city: knowledge and geographical proximity in London's recorded music industry

Abstract: Drawing from debates in economic geography on relational and organisational proximity as a substitute for geographical proximity, the paper explores characteristics of knowledge transfer in London's recorded music industry through an examination of organisational connections on local and global scales. The paper demonstrates that knowledge transfer within the industry occurs simultaneously across multiple geographical scales, with certain organisational connections facilitating the transfer of tacit knowledge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
64
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the 1970s, new sound recording technologies have broken monopolies (Jones 2002), brought about democratization of the recording process, and undermined the position of many recording studios (see Leyshon 2009). Studios now largely act as an independent service within the contemporary recorded music industry, with many owned and operated by entrepreneurial producers and engineers (Watson et al 2008). This has had important repercussions for project work in the music industry by increasing the number of studios and level of skilled studio creatives available to firms and musicians.…”
Section: Project Ecologies In the Recorded Music Industry (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the 1970s, new sound recording technologies have broken monopolies (Jones 2002), brought about democratization of the recording process, and undermined the position of many recording studios (see Leyshon 2009). Studios now largely act as an independent service within the contemporary recorded music industry, with many owned and operated by entrepreneurial producers and engineers (Watson et al 2008). This has had important repercussions for project work in the music industry by increasing the number of studios and level of skilled studio creatives available to firms and musicians.…”
Section: Project Ecologies In the Recorded Music Industry (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of geography for music production is also captured by two routinely used ways to refer to music production: "scenes" when music is created in relatively small contexts where performers, support facilities, and fans loosely interact versus "music industry" when music is produced as a commodity for large audiences using highly formalized conventions with the aim to produce revenue (see Bennett & Peterson, 2004, pp. 3-6;Connell & Gibson, 2003;Watson, 2008). These concepts are not absolute opposites.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Watson (2008). In music, then, agglomeration benefits have always been substantial, but not absolute.…”
Section: Diagram 3 Stylised Representation Of the Interlinked Intra-mentioning
confidence: 99%