It remains unclear whether the latitudinal diversity gradients of micro-and macro-organisms are driven by the same macro-environmental variables. We used the newly completed species catalog and distribution information of bryophytes in China to explore their spatial species richness patterns, and to investigate the underlying roles of energy availability, climatic seasonality, and environmental heterogeneity in shaping these patterns. We then compared these patterns to those found for woody plants. We found that, unlike woody plants, mosses and liverworts showed only weakly negative latitudinal trends in species richness. The spatial patterns of liverwort richness and moss richness were overwhelmingly explained by contemporary environmental variables, although explained variation was lower than that for woody plants. Similar to woody plants, energy and climatic seasonality hypotheses dominate as explanatory variables but show high redundancy in shaping the distribution of bryophytes. Water variables, that is, the annual availability, intra-annual variability and spatial heterogeneity in precipitation, played a predominant role in explaining spatial variation of species richness of bryophytes, especially for liverworts, whereas woody plant richness was affected most by temperature variables. We suggest that further research on spatial patterns of bryophytes should incorporate the knowledge on their ecophysiology and evolution.Key words: biogeography, environmental determinants, latitudinal gradient of diversity, liverworts, micro-organism diversity, mosses.The gradient of increased diversity toward the tropics is observed at various spatial scales and for many taxonomical groups (Willig et al., 2003;Hillebrand, 2004;Field et al., 2009). Understanding the underlying mechanisms of this latitudinal diversity gradient is a major goal in ecology and biogeography (Lomolino et al., 2010). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the observed spatial variation of species richness at broad scales (Brown et al., 2004;Wiens & Donoghue, 2004). Among these hypotheses, available energy, climatic seasonality, and environmental heterogeneity have been used most frequently to account for the spatial variation in species richness of plants and animals (Hawkins et al., 2003;Clarke & Gaston, 2006;Kreft & Jetz, 2007;Tello & Stevens, 2010;Chen et al., 2014;Dalby et al., 2014;Stein et al., 2014). The available energy (or energy-water dynamics) hypothesis states that regions with higher energy availability harbor more species. However, the form of the species-energy relationship and the mechanisms involved depend on the spatial scale (Evans et al., 2008), taxonomic group (Chen et al., 2011), taxonomic rank (Mao et al., 2013), and the currency of energy (Evans et al., 2005) under study. This, in turn, has led to several specific hypotheses focusing on different aspects of energy availability (Hawkins et al., 2003;Clarke & Gaston, 2006;Wang et al., 2010), such as the productivity hypothesis (or more individuals hypothesis)...