2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2019-100002-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global model of a radio-frequency ion thruster based on a holistic treatment of electron and ion density profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the present thruster no critical fraction of charge-exchange ions has been observed so far when simulating comparable operational points. 15 Small currents, a low mass flow and a reasonable background pressure in the 10 −5 mbar range support this behavior.…”
Section: A Thruster Setup / Beam Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For the present thruster no critical fraction of charge-exchange ions has been observed so far when simulating comparable operational points. 15 Small currents, a low mass flow and a reasonable background pressure in the 10 −5 mbar range support this behavior.…”
Section: A Thruster Setup / Beam Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The radial length of the parallel-plane electrodes is set to be the same as that of the simulation domain of the ion optics, and L p is equal to l e . The value of d up should be longer than the thickness of the sheath upstream of SG to correctly resolve the upstream sheath [28], so d up ⩾ 20λ D where λ D = √ ε 0 T e /(en p ) is the Debye length, n p is the plasma density and T e is the electron temperature [29,33].…”
Section: Model Setup and Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B and C are the functions of the sheath thickness t s since equation ( 10) is derived based on the assumption that the electric field at the sheath edge is zero. Assuming that the sheath thickness t s is approximately 20λ D [15,25] where λ D = ε 0 T e /(en e ) area where the divergence angles drop significantly with the increase of n p . It can be seen that F m will always be higher than D when γ o ∈ [0, 1] and n p > n p,max , which corresponds to the potential distributions shown in figure 5(b) and proves that the ion optics cannot match with the density higher than n p,max .…”
Section: One-dimensional Matching Model Of Ion Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some earlier works tried to simulate the formation of the upstream sheath or even presheath self-consistently [20,21], but it was proved by Li and Sun [22] that the local model of ion optics can only describe a given sheath and is unable to form the presheath. Therefore, the simulations of positive ion extraction were more effective in the investigations of the beam characteristics and grid erosion [11,[23][24][25] or the ion dynamics in the sheath field [4,10]. Consequently, the structure particularity of the ion optics makes it difficult for experiments and simulations to analyze the detailed sheath characteristics and the mechanism of its effect on beam divergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%