2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (CBPES) allow individuals, governments, NGOs and private companies to pay for ecosystem services such as C storage and water conservation by supporting local-level projects promoting both community development and poverty alleviation [161]. These projects are being encouraged by international climate policies and investments [162]. In this issue, Dougill et al [163] review multiple CBPES that deliver C and poverty reduction benefits in African forests.…”
Section: Research Gaps and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (CBPES) allow individuals, governments, NGOs and private companies to pay for ecosystem services such as C storage and water conservation by supporting local-level projects promoting both community development and poverty alleviation [161]. These projects are being encouraged by international climate policies and investments [162]. In this issue, Dougill et al [163] review multiple CBPES that deliver C and poverty reduction benefits in African forests.…”
Section: Research Gaps and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of whether or not the benefits from ecological restoration outweigh the costs are scarce (Bullock et al, 2011). A focus on restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services will require more emphasis on the benefits of stakeholders, one of the goals of the widely implemented Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) (Farley et al, 2010). Trade-offs among biodiversity conservation, maintaining of ecosystem services, and extensive land use are always popular topics of restoration research.…”
Section: Restoration For Sustainable Grassland Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAO, 2007;TEEB, 2010), present initiatives are still small-scale in nature. Slowing down or reversing the present trend of ecosystem degradation may require global and compulsory incentives (Farley et al, 2010) comparable to the incentive measures being applied to combat man-made climate change, such as international emission trading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%