2015
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1011792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global mapping of greenhouse gases retrieved from GOSAT Level 2 products by using a kriging method

Abstract: Because a synoptic overview facilitates understanding of the temporal and spatial changes in the global distribution of greenhouse gases, we developed a statistical spatial estimation method using kriging. Level 3 (L3) data products for the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for Carbon Observation (TANSO) Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) Short Wave Infrared (SWIR) were generated from column-averaged, dry-air mole fractions of carbon dioxide (XCO 2 ) and methane (X… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, where the emission of such seeps occur as concentrated point sources, the escaping methane can form discernible gas-plume in the atmosphere and thus constitute detectable target. Current orbital gas remote sensing instruments like the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) and the Greenhouse Gas Observing Satellite (GOSAT) have the capability to measure methane and other trace gasses but only in continental scales (Watanabe et al, 2015). The delineation of point source plumes at local-scale, however, is a niche that is filled with high spatial (GSD<20 m) and spectral resolution hyperspectral imaging instruments.…”
Section: Gas-plume Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, where the emission of such seeps occur as concentrated point sources, the escaping methane can form discernible gas-plume in the atmosphere and thus constitute detectable target. Current orbital gas remote sensing instruments like the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) and the Greenhouse Gas Observing Satellite (GOSAT) have the capability to measure methane and other trace gasses but only in continental scales (Watanabe et al, 2015). The delineation of point source plumes at local-scale, however, is a niche that is filled with high spatial (GSD<20 m) and spectral resolution hyperspectral imaging instruments.…”
Section: Gas-plume Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It improved the data precision compared with XCO 2 from conventional spatio-temporal kriging, especially for data in the satellites overlapping period. As a result, GM-XCO 2 could help us understand the temporal and spatial changes in the global distribution of CO 2 [17]. Because GM-XCO 2 is from instantaneous satellite observations, it could capture detailed and abnormal XCO 2 change which could be related to local carbon uptake and emission [10,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A network of surface CO 2 monitoring station observations has been organized into the popular GLOBALVIEW-CO 2 product and provides in situ measurements but is limited by station sparseness and the inherent spatial inhomogeneity of the surface atmosphere. Model simulations can provide continuous maps of CO 2 using estimated surface fluxes and atmospheric mixing transport in addition to the previously noted sparse validation stations [17]. Satellite observations of atmospheric CO 2 have the advantage of global coverage and high measurement density and can complement the surface network to advance our understandings of the carbon cycle and its changes [18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we compare the prediction accuracy between spatio-temporal and spatial-only method based on the cross-validation statistics. The spatial-only method implemented here is similar to that for generating monthly GOSAT Level 3 data [13]. The whole XCH 4 dataset is firstly grouped into monthly datasets (five years = 60 months), and then the variogram for each month is calculated and modeled by the exponential variogram model.…”
Section: Precision Evaluation Using Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%