2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Longitudinal Strain as a Major Predictor of Cardiac Events in Patients with Depressed Left Ventricular Function: A Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
116
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
116
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the need for more‐sensitive measures of LV performance, advances in image analysis have led to noninvasive methods for assessing cardiac mechanical function in multiple planes 2, 3. Numerous studies have now demonstrated that speckle tracking analyses of LV strain (ie, myocardial tissue deformation) applied to routine echocardiography offer significant incremental prognostic information over EF in patients with known cardiovascular disease (CVD) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. However, there are few studies of LV strain and outcomes in community‐dwelling individuals free of overt CVD 10, 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the need for more‐sensitive measures of LV performance, advances in image analysis have led to noninvasive methods for assessing cardiac mechanical function in multiple planes 2, 3. Numerous studies have now demonstrated that speckle tracking analyses of LV strain (ie, myocardial tissue deformation) applied to routine echocardiography offer significant incremental prognostic information over EF in patients with known cardiovascular disease (CVD) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. However, there are few studies of LV strain and outcomes in community‐dwelling individuals free of overt CVD 10, 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with LVEF, GLS is a more sensitive, objective, and reproducible modality for assessing cardiac functions, even among HF patients with preserved LVEF and CKD patients (11)(12)(13)(14). In the general population, GLS has proven to be a prognostic predictor (13,14). Reports suggest that subclinical LV systolic dysfunction, as indicated by GLS, is present in CKD and ESRD patients (8,12,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more negative value of GLS, the better the LV function is. Compared with LVEF, GLS is a more sensitive, objective, and reproducible modality for assessing cardiac functions, even among HF patients with preserved LVEF and CKD patients (11)(12)(13)(14). In the general population, GLS has proven to be a prognostic predictor (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is less load dependent than LVEF and may have higher prognostic value. In a multicenter study comparing echocardiographic parameters in patients with HF, global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessment, a parameter evaluating longitudinal aspect of myocardial contraction using deformation imaging, appeared to have a higher and more reliable prognostic value than LVEF for the prediction of cardiac events and cardiac deaths [20]. 2D speckle tracking strain has already been evaluated in studies for a total of more than 700 patients concomitantly to the administration of cardiotoxic anticancer agents, with encouraging results concerning its capability to diagnose subclinical LV dysfunction of subsequent clinical relevance [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Imaging Techniques Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%