2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2005.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global localization and relative positioning based on scale-invariant keypoints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following a similar approach, but in a non-incremental perspective, voting methods presented in [14] and [15] call upon maximum likelihood estimation to match the current image with a database of images acquired beforehand. The likelihood depends upon the number of feature correspondences between the images, and leads to a vote assessing the amount of similarity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following a similar approach, but in a non-incremental perspective, voting methods presented in [14] and [15] call upon maximum likelihood estimation to match the current image with a database of images acquired beforehand. The likelihood depends upon the number of feature correspondences between the images, and leads to a vote assessing the amount of similarity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood depends upon the number of feature correspondences between the images, and leads to a vote assessing the amount of similarity. In [14], the authors also use multipleview geometry to validate each matching hypothesis, while in [15] the accuracy of the likelihood is qualitatively evaluated in order to reject outliers. Even though they are easy to implement, voting methods rely on an offline construction of the image database and need expensive one-to-one image comparisons when searching for the most likely hypotheses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the planar sea floor of this experiment, a monocular two-dimensional setup is used. The visual odometer estimates robot motion and pose from image features that can be well localized and that are relatively invariant to contrast, scale, and view point [20][21][22]. The type of features that gives best results depends on the type of scene and can be adapted during a mission, though we find that in natural environments blobs-round areas with high contrast against the background-give more reliable estimates than edges and lines.…”
Section: The Vision Module Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more proper solution is proposed by Brooks [21] which formulates a least square approach to the planar relative pose given noise free correspondences. This result was used in [22,23,2] for various robotics applications all in combination with RANSAC. In [22,24] it was shown that two correspondences are enough to solve the problem and both suggest algorithms, which are briefly evaluated in combination with RANSAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%