2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05716-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global–local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been shown (LaBarbera et al, 1976;Walden and Field, 1982;Striano et al, 2002;Grossmann et al, 2007) that children identify happy expressions earlier in development and more reliably. Regarding the cognitive mechanisms underlying these results, it has been argued that (1) the procession of angry faces requires less attentional resources compared to angry and other expressions (Becker et al, 2011;Pool et al, 2016) and, furthermore, that (2) happy faces facilitate global processing while angry expressions facilitate local processing (Kerusauskaite et al, 2020). However, the HSE may also reflect a positivity bias due to our expectations of positive over negative signals (Leppänen and Hietanen, 2004), i.e., facilitating the recognition of happy faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Indeed, it has been shown (LaBarbera et al, 1976;Walden and Field, 1982;Striano et al, 2002;Grossmann et al, 2007) that children identify happy expressions earlier in development and more reliably. Regarding the cognitive mechanisms underlying these results, it has been argued that (1) the procession of angry faces requires less attentional resources compared to angry and other expressions (Becker et al, 2011;Pool et al, 2016) and, furthermore, that (2) happy faces facilitate global processing while angry expressions facilitate local processing (Kerusauskaite et al, 2020). However, the HSE may also reflect a positivity bias due to our expectations of positive over negative signals (Leppänen and Hietanen, 2004), i.e., facilitating the recognition of happy faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We aim to open up the study of executive functions further to bring together findings of the examination of different types of situations. We focus on externally structured situations, such as in the research area of task switching (Kiesel et al, 2010;Koch et al, 2018;Vandierendonck et al, 2010), as well as higher order sequence effects (Gao et al, 2009;Mayr & Bell, 2006;Meiran et al, 2000;Senftleben et al, 2021), and strategies (e.g., Brüning & Manzey, 2018;Kerusauskaite et al, 2020) that are only observable in self-structured situations. This poses three demands on the paradigm, which has to (i) involve the processing of more than two tasks in order to capture the multitude of real-world tasks and to enable an examination of sequence effects, (ii) continuously confront participants with various relevant and irrelevant stimuli for the tasks (thereby involving different sub-capabilities of executive functions, and reflecting the complexity of reality), and (iii) allow for self-determined behaviour which will be expressed in various forms of behaviour of different participants, that is, there is no particular prescription for the processing sequence of stimuli and tasks.…”
Section: Our Research Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected to find effects typically assessed via classical task switching and voluntary task switching paradigms, such as switch costs (Druey & Hübner, 2008;Mittelstädt et al, 2018;Rogers & Monsell, 1995), asymmetric switch costs (Schneider & Anderson, 2010;Spitzer et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2015), and a higher probability of task repetition with shorter preparation time (Arrington, 2008;Arrington & Logan, 2004;Mayr & Bell, 2006). Additionally, we assumed to identify influences of processing sequences (Gao et al, 2009;Mayr & Bell, 2006;Meiran et al, 2000), and the occurrence of different self-selected processing strategies (e.g., Brüning & Manzey, 2018;Kerusauskaite et al, 2020) which can only be observed in a self-structured paradigm.…”
Section: Our Research Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%