2022
DOI: 10.5853/jos.2022.00752
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Mortality

Abstract: Background and Purpose Recent studies suggested an increased incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated the volume of CVT hospitalization and in-hospital mortality during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 171 stroke centers from 49 countries. We recorded COVID-19 admission volumes, CVT hospitalization, and CVT in-hospital mortality from Januar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the primary outcome of this study, mRS 3–6 at 90-day follow-up, was low at 15.6%. While this is consistent with prior studies [ 5 , 40 ], it is possible that other factors such as concomitant COVID-19 infection [ 41 , 42 ] are relevant in the prognostication of CVT but were undetected in this study due to a small effect size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, the primary outcome of this study, mRS 3–6 at 90-day follow-up, was low at 15.6%. While this is consistent with prior studies [ 5 , 40 ], it is possible that other factors such as concomitant COVID-19 infection [ 41 , 42 ] are relevant in the prognostication of CVT but were undetected in this study due to a small effect size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Secondarily, we defined the second wave as the first definition, with the addition of two or more months apart between the peak of the first wave and the start of the second wave. 31…”
Section: Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start date for this occurrence was chosen as the minimum closest to the second wave. Secondarily, we defined the second wave as the first definition, with the addition of 2 or more months apart between the peak of the first wave and the start of the second wave 31 (eTable 2).…”
Section: Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start date for this occurrence was chosen as the case volume minimum closest to the second wave. Our secondary definition was the primary definition plus a minimum of 2 months between the peak of the first wave and the start of the second wave 14 15. Centres were divided by low-volume, intermediate-volume and high-volume strata by mean monthly volume tertiles for COVID-19 hospitalisation submitted data (<26.33 vs >26.33 to 126.53 vs >126.53).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%