2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3779876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of One-Dose Versus Two-Dose Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Schedules: A Comparative Modelling Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with a pessimistic assumption that the efficacy of one dose is lower than two/three doses, adopting a one-dose schedule would free up vaccine doses to allow more rapid scale-up of vaccination, and generate the greatest cost savings and health gains with constrained supply in China. Our results about the one-dose schedule are generally consistent with previous modelling studies, 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 which suggest promising health benefits (in terms of improving both impact and efficiency) and favourable cost-effectiveness of one-dose strategies. However, few studies have explicitly incorporated supply constraints when comparing the impact of adopting a one-dose schedule with other strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Even with a pessimistic assumption that the efficacy of one dose is lower than two/three doses, adopting a one-dose schedule would free up vaccine doses to allow more rapid scale-up of vaccination, and generate the greatest cost savings and health gains with constrained supply in China. Our results about the one-dose schedule are generally consistent with previous modelling studies, 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 which suggest promising health benefits (in terms of improving both impact and efficiency) and favourable cost-effectiveness of one-dose strategies. However, few studies have explicitly incorporated supply constraints when comparing the impact of adopting a one-dose schedule with other strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Among the preponderant factors are the establishment of consistent herd immunity, protecting the population from infection by a major cause of malignant neoplasms, reducing deaths linked to HPV infection, budget relief through cost reduction and greater ease of administration. (36)(37) As for the vaccine efficacy found in the scheme with just one dose of bivalent vaccine, an efficacy finding of 82.1% was observed, a value minimally lower than the value observed with the two-dose scheme of bivalent vaccine. The same is observed years after application of the vaccine when there is stable immunity against HPV, which strengthens the evidence that just one dose would be sufficient for adequate protection 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…4,24 The high level of efficacy builds on observational data 11,12 and provides rigorous evidence for single-dose HPV vaccination to prevent persistent HPV infections, which could increase vaccine access and coverage, offering a cost-effective strategy for cervical cancer prevention. 25 Strengths of the study include the randomized, double-blind, controlled design, high retention, measurement of cervical HPV DNA as the outcome, determination of persistent HPV DNA, and the head-to-head comparison of the licensed bivalent and nonavalent HPV vaccines in protection against persistent infection with oncogenic HPV types included in the vaccines. In addition, the trial successfully enrolled persons exposed to HPV infection who were successfully retained in all randomized groups, allowing rapid assessment of single-dose efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%