Global imbalances and household savings: The role of wealth

Abstract

Many claim that fluctuations in US private savings help to create and to sustain global imbalances because of their influence on the current account deficit. To test this claim, this paper investigates the determinants of aggregate household savings using a panel of 18 developed countries for the period 1980-2005. We weave two strands of literature: the first strand from consumer theory, considering specifically the `wealth effect', the second strand from aggregate private savings theory. The original contribution of this paper derives from the main explanatory variables of the household savings function: two measures of household wealth, the first a financial variable and the second a variable for tangible/housing stock. The salience of these variables has not been tested before. The model is then enriched with variables taken from the private savings literature.To find the best technique to estimate the long run savings function, unit root and cointegration tests are carried out, from which evidence of a cointegrating relationship is found. The group means FMOLS is used to estimate the model. The empirical evidence suggests effects consistent with theory: an increase in wealth negatively affects household savings. Furthermore, when important explanatory variables, such as government savings and population dependency ratios, are included in the model, tangible wealth becomes the only kind of wealth to (weakly and negatively) influence household savings in developed countries. In the US however, wealth does not seem to affect household savings negatively, it seems instead that government savings and population changes better explain the decline of savings during the past two decades. This finding provides additional evidence on the issue of global imbalances, and suggests that the recent booms of the stock and the real estate markets should not be blamed for the decline in US household and private savings.JEL: E21, C23

Determinants of Saving in Poland: Are They Different from Those in Other OECD Countries?

“…On the one hand, Hüfner and Koske (2010) argue that the wealth effect was significant in the case of the recent behavior of the German saving rate. On the other hand, Salotti (2010), using separate measures for financial and nonfinancial wealth, finds that only the latter weakly and negatively influences the household saving rate in developed countries, except for the United States, where wealth does not affect household saving negatively. • Other factors: Social processes such as urbanization, macroeconomic cyclical fluctuations (often proxied by changes in the unemployment rate), and cultural characteristics (see Castro Campos, Kool, and Muysken 2013) may also influence aggregate saving.…”

Unfolding tensions within post-settlement governance and tribal economies in Aotearoa New Zealand

“…Another emerging issue for tribes relates to deeper conversations about rebalancing wealth and capital, which invoke a range of diverse responses, given the current predicament of advanced, developed and emerging economies (Beck and Fidora, 2008; Roubini, 2011; Salotti, 2008; Scharmer, 2009; UNDP, 2013). The concepts of shared capital and wealth distribution add to the chaotic discussions about those who have wealth and control wealth and those who have none or very little, and therefore, little or no control over their lives.…”

A Tobit Analysis of the Determinants and Potentials of Savings in the Case of Payatas Households

“…Homeownership: For most families, homeownership is the primary form of wealth accumulation (Grinstein-Weiss, Chowa & Casalotti, 2010;Salotti, 2010). In trying to analyze the influence of wealth on household savings, homeownership was used as a proxy in most studies over the past decade.…”