2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1740022809990362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization

Abstract: Globalization can be interpreted as a dialectical process of de- and re-territorialization. The challenges to existing borders that limit economic, socio-cultural, and political activities, and the establishment of new borders as the result of such activities, bring about certain consolidated structures of spatiality, while at the same time societies develop regulatory regimes to use these structures for purposes of dominance and integration. Global history in our understanding investigates the historical root… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the geopolitical factor, the crisis of area studies derived from the notion that these areas involved excessive academic specialization and did not reflect the concerns of a globalized world in which the idea of the nation-state was surpassed by transcontinental ties. 58 The crisis of legitimacy was followed by a significant reduction in resources for area studies (Martin; West, 1999, pp.106-111).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the geopolitical factor, the crisis of area studies derived from the notion that these areas involved excessive academic specialization and did not reflect the concerns of a globalized world in which the idea of the nation-state was surpassed by transcontinental ties. 58 The crisis of legitimacy was followed by a significant reduction in resources for area studies (Martin; West, 1999, pp.106-111).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middell and Naumann, 2010) has pointed out and discussed deficits in historiography. Especially comparative approaches have been subject to scrutiny.…”
Section: Emerging Horizons Of Future Research: Histories Of Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why would we study cultural mediators in this context? First of all, to an even greater extent than the revered figures of the national literary and cultural tradition, cultural mediators or passeurs , as Werner, Espagne, Middell, Leerssen and Charle have shown in their research on the history of cultural transfers, are the true architects of the common frames of reference and of (sub)national or international cultural identities (Espagne & Werner ; Charle ; Middell & Naumann , 153; Leerssen ). A focus on intercultural mediators will therefore result in an essential revision of literary and artistic historiography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mediator is the window through which we can observe the shifts in cultural identities. In other words, ‘we need histories that describe the meshing and shifting of different spatial references, narratives in which historical agency is emphasized, and interpretations acknowledging that the changing patterns of spatialization are processes fraught with tension’ (Middell & Naumann , 161, emphasis added).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%