2018
DOI: 10.17157/mat.5.2.535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global health enabling systems

Abstract: Scientific alliances are typically referred to as 'collaborations' but in recent times, those with global health or other development goals are increasingly referred to as 'partnerships'. I observe that one of the features common to this type of partnership is temporality: flagship programs are frequently initiated but less commonly sustained. Thus the pressure that shortterm transnational projects place on African health and educational systems that implement them is sometimes hard to justify. I suggest that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, ‘partnership’ is central to the way in which global health science is imagined, or dreamed, by its leading practitioners. Many African researchers share this vision of good partnerships as rooted if not necessarily in resource equity, then in an equity of ideas and scientific contribution (Parker and Kingori 2016; Okwaro and Geissler 2015; Okeke 2018; Boum 2018). This dream of partnership distinguishes global health from its paternalistic antecedents and stakes an ethical claim – two interrelated goals.…”
Section: Dreams and Realities In Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, ‘partnership’ is central to the way in which global health science is imagined, or dreamed, by its leading practitioners. Many African researchers share this vision of good partnerships as rooted if not necessarily in resource equity, then in an equity of ideas and scientific contribution (Parker and Kingori 2016; Okwaro and Geissler 2015; Okeke 2018; Boum 2018). This dream of partnership distinguishes global health from its paternalistic antecedents and stakes an ethical claim – two interrelated goals.…”
Section: Dreams and Realities In Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do so by allocating legal power and capacity to non-profit corporations that act primarily on behalf of the US partner institution, while simultaneously shielding them from liability. Might these administrative enabling systems be facilitating arrangements that are harmful to African institution building, even as they make the logistics of partnership easier (Okeke 2018)? In this way, such systems may reflect an alternative definition common in certain subfields of psychology, where ‘enabling’ refers to the facilitation of self-destructive behaviour by another 15…”
Section: Enabling Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calls to increase trust and transparency, and the tools employed in their names, operate in the African context as what Jemima Pierre (2020) terms racial vernac ulars. Suspicions of corruption, for instance, are figured through longstanding tropes of Africans and Africa rooted in lack, indiscipline, duplicity, backwardness, or incompetence (Crane 2018;Muir and Gupta 2018: S6;Smith 2007). Suspicion and mistrust infuse infrastructures and technologies that aim to capture illicit be haviours or people, whether sugar cane thieves or potentially corrupt NGO staff or beneficiaries of donor projects.…”
Section: Racialised Suspicionmentioning
confidence: 99%