Global governance vs empire: Why world order moves towards heterarchy and hierarchy

Baumann, Rainer; Dingwerth, Klaus

doi:10.1057/jird.2014.6

Cited by 17 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is essentially successful in increasing participation and incorporating all stakeholders or leaving regulation in their hands (Smismans 2008 ). The co-responsibility nature of heterarchy has a basic component of contemporary world politics (Baumann and Dingwerth 2015 , p 123).…”

Section: The Politics Of Subsidiarity and The Eu Welcome Culture: A H...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, subsidiarity in migration governance has been transformed by individual and institutional human rights activism initiatives. A shift from top-down/bottom-up hierarchical relations to “network-based and urban/local-oriented reflexive self-organization” occurred in these heterarchical relations (Baldacchino and Sammut 2016 ; Baumann and Dingwerth 2015 ; Belmonte and Cerny 2021 ; Blühdorn and Deflorian 2021 ; Cumming 2016 ; Curry 2018 ; Goldstein and Glaser 2012 ; Jessop 2003 , 2009 ; Smismans 2008 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The EU’s Hospitality and Welcome Culture: Conceiving the “No Human Being Is Illegal” Principle in the EU Fundamental Freedoms and Migration Governance

Aliu

2022

Hum Rights Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to highlight the theoretical and philosophical debate on hospitality underlining the normative elements of framing migrants and refugees as individual agents in the light of hospitality theory and migration governance. It argued the critiques of the neo-Kantian hospitality approach and the EU welcome culture with regard to refugees in the EU from a philosophical perspective. The “No human being is illegal” motto is proposed to be conceived as a principle of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The cosmopolitan right to visit and the universal right to reside were discussed in the context of human rights and co-responsibility. Linking the hospitality approach with migration governance enables the reconstruction of reception policies and practices, diversification of non-state actors that engage in migration governance mechanism, and polarization of political initiatives (e.g., politics of allocation and dispersal, readmission negotiations, convergence/divergence of priorities and strategic interests). The research findings highlight that the EU adopted a neo-Kantian hospitality approach that combines both “co-responsibility” and “vertical/heterarchical relations.” The EU’s “New Pact on Migration and Asylum” was considered proof of how the EU follows neo-Kantian hospitality that is manifested in dualism and contradictory approach. The study presents a typology that splits co-responsibility into individual/institutional actions and human rights/migration governance.

show abstract

Section: The Politics Of Subsidiarity and The Eu Welcome Culture: A H...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The EU’s Hospitality and Welcome Culture: Conceiving the “No Human Being Is Illegal” Principle in the EU Fundamental Freedoms and Migration Governance

Aliu

2022

Hum Rights Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zaszłości historyczne oraz tradycje i schematy myślowe obecne w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych sprawiały, że w różnych paradygmatach badawczych na pierwszy plan wybijała się jedna bądź druga, podczas gdy być może jest tak, że to heterarchiczna sieć łącząca w sobie elementy obydwu porządków jest bardziej odpowiednim terminem opisującym rzeczywistość międzynarodową (Miura, 2003;Baumann, Dingwerth, 2014)? SYSTEM MIĘDZYNARODOWY JAKO STRUKTURA SIECIOWA Sposób widzenia rzeczywistości jako sieci dobrze oddaje wyraz "system".…”

Section: Sieci W Stosunkach Międzynarodowychunclassified

Użyteczność badawcza struktur sieciowych w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych

Stachyra¹,

Lublinie²

2021

athena

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A growing number of social scientists have recognized that heterarchies actually have strengths of their own, which we often fail to appreciate. These scholars suggest that our brain (Bruni and Giorgi 2015), firms and organizations (Hedlund 1986(Hedlund , 1993Hedlund et al 1990;Girard and Stark 2003), constitutional legal systems (Joerges et al 2004;Halberstam 2008), and systems of global governance (Baumann and Dingwerth 2015) are all examples of heterarchies and that the value anomaly which McCulloch identified is a feature that defines these systems, not a bug to be done away with. Heterarchy seems to be the natural state of the world, and heterarchical organizations (including the brain) might well be a response to that world.…”

Section: Hierarchies Of Values Commensuration and Genuine Choicementioning

confidence: 99%