The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-01104004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Good Samaritans? Human Rights Foreign Policy in Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of transitional justice also follows a broader normative shift in global politics that includes human rights as important elements of international affairs and foreign policy (Thomas 2001;Brysk 2009). It also reflects an institutional response to continuing occurrence of mass atrocity, such as the genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda, which in the post-Cold War era have come to be treated as threats to international peace and stability and have contributed directly to the creation of international justice institutions (Sikkink 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of transitional justice also follows a broader normative shift in global politics that includes human rights as important elements of international affairs and foreign policy (Thomas 2001;Brysk 2009). It also reflects an institutional response to continuing occurrence of mass atrocity, such as the genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda, which in the post-Cold War era have come to be treated as threats to international peace and stability and have contributed directly to the creation of international justice institutions (Sikkink 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note 1. This point is of course contested, as constructivists contend that a state's identity and interests can change toward prioritizing human rights abroad (Finnemore 2004;Brysk 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed below, the call for greater political space to further an emancipatory approach to human security is not concerned with factors that would allow or encourage more actors to more fully adopt a liberal approach to human security (though there are studies that address this: Kerr et al 2003;Hataley and Nossal 2004;Brysk 2005;Fischer 2005). Nor is it concerned with simply increasing the role for civil society actors, as in their current forms, these actors at times tend to support the status quo, the mechanisms of liberal peacebuilding which are actually the technology through which space is controlled and narrowed.…”
Section: Creating Space For Counter-hegemonic Practices: the Role Of mentioning
confidence: 99%