2017
DOI: 10.1130/abs/2017am-300835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Geologic Map of Europa: Usgs Scientific Investigation Map (Sim)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it does not correspond to any particular geologic unit (Leonard et al 2017) or any unusual visible morphological or albedo features (USGS 2002). The anomaly is located within a region of relatively low-resolution imaging and was not covered by the published Galileo PPR data, so it is possible that a corresponding morphological, geologic, or thermal feature was simply not seen by Galileo.…”
Section: Fits To Alma Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it does not correspond to any particular geologic unit (Leonard et al 2017) or any unusual visible morphological or albedo features (USGS 2002). The anomaly is located within a region of relatively low-resolution imaging and was not covered by the published Galileo PPR data, so it is possible that a corresponding morphological, geologic, or thermal feature was simply not seen by Galileo.…”
Section: Fits To Alma Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stratigraphic relationships on Europa are complex, and older terrains are a generally poor predictor of current geologic activity (Greeley et al 2000;Figueredo & Greeley 2004;Doggett et al 2009;Leonard et al 2018b). Because past geologic change recorded in the icy surface is not a reliable indicator of future geologic resurfacing, we assume that resurfacing is equally as likely anywhere on the body at any given time.…”
Section: Geologic Basis For Resurfacing Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conservative approach assumes that the poles, leading and trailing hemispheres, and Jovian and sub-Jovian hemispheres all experience a high level of geologic activity at present day, resulting in a young average global surface age. We thus formally ignore any potential spatial variations in geologic activity, which may manifest due to, for example, spatial variations in tidal activity (e.g., Ojakangas & Stevenson 1989) or be concealed by poor global coverage of spacecraft observations (e.g., Phillips et al 2000;Doggett et al 2009;Leonard et al 2018b;Schenk 2020).…”
Section: Geologic Basis For Resurfacing Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the Galileo mission, RAND and the USGS created a combined Voyager‐Galileo control network, which was subsequently used to produce a global, relatively controlled, orthorectified (to a sphere) image basemap at 500 m per pixel (Becker et al., 2001 ; Davies et al., 1998 ) ( https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/map/Europa/Voyager-Galileo/Europa_Voyager_GalileoSSI_global_mosaic_500m ). This image base has been used extensively, including recently for global geologic mapping (Leonard et al., 2018 ). In an independent effort, a global color image basemap (also orthorectified to a sphere) was generated using updated image geometry by Paul Schenk at 200 m per pixel https://repository.hou.usra.edu/handle/20.500.11753/1412 .…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All mosaics are provided in a planetocentric east‐positive, 0–360° longitude system for consistency with the current geologic map (Leonard et al., 2018 ) and the requirements of the Jupiter Icy moons Explorer and Clipper missions. An east‐positive standard is also more readily used in GIS applications.…”
Section: Released Data Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%