2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2383825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Framework Agreements in a Union-Hostile Environment: The Case of the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, it is still a contested space (Edwards and Bélanger 2009;Levy 2008). As empirical research has shown, management resistance to TNC subsidiaries having union recognition has been a constant barrier to implementation (Fichter and Stevis 2013;Fichter et al 2012).…”
Section: S66mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it is still a contested space (Edwards and Bélanger 2009;Levy 2008). As empirical research has shown, management resistance to TNC subsidiaries having union recognition has been a constant barrier to implementation (Fichter and Stevis 2013;Fichter et al 2012).…”
Section: S66mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At another Brazilian subsidiary of a major auto supplier, local management refused to bargain collectively in good faith until the union joined forces with the responsible GUF and the home country union and pressured the TNC's headquarters management into honouring the GFA at the local plant (Arruda et al, 2012). In the USA, we found a few cases in which there was a similar pattern of transnational union networking to put pressure on headquarters management (Fichter and Stevis, 2013). In our research in Turkey, we came across another example of such transnational union networking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, formal employment relations are only a small portion of the labour market as a whole, which is dominated by the informal economy. In such a situation, the implementation of a GFA requires different instruments and a different approach from that of a country such as the US in which internal plant Ersatz-unions are banned and the majority of employment relationships are in some way legally defined and regulated -but nevertheless reflective of local practices (Fichter and Stevis, 2013).…”
Section: Implementation Iii: Operational Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the growing importance of MNCs, both in the United States and worldwide, American unions such as the Service Employees International Union, United Food and Commercial Workers and others have participated in global organizing campaigns. 2 Conducted with the assistance of UNI Global Union, International Transport Federation, and other global union federations, these multifaceted campaigns have stressed corporate violations of core ILO conventions and have utilized soft law instruments such as the United Nations Global Compact and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Corporations. In response, large union avoidance law firms have not only internationalized their operations, but also proposed using global standards offensively against labor organizations, and attempted to use ILO jurisprudence to argue that employers have a right-and even an obligation-to oppose unionization.…”
Section: [L]arge Union Avoidance Law Firms Have Attemptedmentioning
confidence: 99%