2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2019)103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global fit to b → cτν transitions

Abstract: We perform a general model-independent analysis of b → cτν τ transitions, including measurements of R D , R D * , their q 2 differential distributions, the recently measured longitudinal D * polarization F D * L , and constraints from the B c → τν τ lifetime, each of which has significant impact on the fit. A global fit to a general set of Wilson coefficients of an effective low-energy Hamiltonian is presented, the solutions of which are interpreted in terms of hypothetical new-physics mediators. From the obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
236
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(244 reference statements)
9
236
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(3.31). A sizeable scalar contribution to b → cτ −ν decays is known to improve the quality of fits [36,38,39,[49][50][51]. We require it to be comparable with the left-handed one, i.e.…”
Section: Constraints On Fn Chargesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.31). A sizeable scalar contribution to b → cτ −ν decays is known to improve the quality of fits [36,38,39,[49][50][51]. We require it to be comparable with the left-handed one, i.e.…”
Section: Constraints On Fn Chargesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the new Belle measurements, see Refs. [33][34][35][36][37]) 1 . On the other hand, particular NP scenarios such as: charged scalars [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62], leptoquarks (both scalar and vector) , extra gauge bosons [47,94,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111], right-handed neutrinos [62,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113], R-parity violating (RPV) supersymmetric couplings [31,[114][115]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…measured recently by LHCb to be R J/ψ = 0.71 ± 0.17 ± 0.18 [41]. Although the ratio is also measured to be enhanced with respect to the SM prediction R SM J/ψ ≈ 0.25-0.29 [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], the central value of the measurement shows a very large effect that cannot be wellaccommodated with BSM contributions [37]. The observable f D * L , the longitudinal polarisation of the D * in B → D * τ ν, also differs from the SM expectation by ∼ 1.6σ:…”
Section: Charged Current Processesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Together these measurements amount to a deviation 3σ [35,37] from SM predictions, which can be significantly reduced in the presence of new physics [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Charged Current Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%