2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global existence and boundedness in a Keller–Segel–Stokes system involving a tensor-valued sensitivity with saturation: The 3D case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in the case of the chemotaxis-fluid system without including the chemotactic force on fluid, we can immediately establish the regularity for u once we have the corresponding L p estimate of n (see e.g. [15], [18], [19], [31], [29], [30], [37]). This is not valid in the present setting.…”
Section: Yulan Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in the case of the chemotaxis-fluid system without including the chemotactic force on fluid, we can immediately establish the regularity for u once we have the corresponding L p estimate of n (see e.g. [15], [18], [19], [31], [29], [30], [37]). This is not valid in the present setting.…”
Section: Yulan Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these challenges, some comprehensive results on the global-boundedness and large time behavior of solutions are available in the literature (see [3,19,20,25,27,29,33,34,35] for example). It has been shown that when S = S(x, ρ, c) is a tensor fulfilling |S(x, ρ, c)| ≤ C S (1 + ρ) α for some α > 0 and C S > 0, (1.4) the three-dimensional system (1.3) with µ = 0, κ = 0 admits globally bounded weak solutions for α > 1/2 [27], which is slightly stronger than the corresponding subcritical assumption α > 1/3 for the fluid-free system. As for α ≥ 0, when the suitably regular initial data (ρ 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) fulfill a smallness condition, (1.3) with µ = 0, κ = 1 possesses a global classical solution which decays to (ρ 0 ,ρ 0 , 0) exponentially withρ 0 = 1 |Ω| Ω ρ 0 (x)dx [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if in (1.2) the summand −∇·(n∇c) is replaced by −∇ · (nS(n)∇c) with S suitably generalizing the prototype given by S(s) = (s + 1) −α for all s ≥ 0 and some α > 0, then known results assert global existence of bounded solutions to a corresponding initial-boundary value problem when in the context of (1.6) we have m + α > 7 6 ([36]), which in the particular case α = 0 considered here rediscovers (1.4) and is thereby stronger than (1.10). An interesting open problem, partially addressed in [33], [34] and [35], consists in determining optimal conditions on the interplay between these two mechanisms which indeed prevent explosions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%