2023
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00501-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
226
0
4

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
226
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest incidence rates are observed in Eastern Asia, South Central Asia, and Central and Eastern Europe. Besides, OC is the eighth most common malignancy among women [ 11 ], (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest incidence rates are observed in Eastern Asia, South Central Asia, and Central and Eastern Europe. Besides, OC is the eighth most common malignancy among women [ 11 ], (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, over 600,000 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer globally, while 300,000 died from it [ 1 ]. In a call to eliminate cervical cancer, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched the 90-70-90 target for countries to achieve by 2030: (1) 90% of girls fully vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) by the age of 15; (2) 70% of women screened with a high-performance test by the age of 35 and 45; (3) 90% of women identified with cervical precancer and cancer received treatment [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The incidence of cervical cancer in countries with a low Human Development Index (HDI) is 3 times higher than that of high-HDI countries, and mortality rates are 6 times higher than those in countries with high HDI. 8 Further, a major effect on mortality was observed, particularly in the United States, where the cervical cancer death rate is 2-fold higher among women residing in high-vs low-poverty areas. 6 The results presented by Chung et al, 1 in accordance with those of other authors, including ours, demonstrate the current alarming inadequacy of CCS in patients with SLE.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%