2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Energetics of Solar Flares. VII. Aerodynamic Drag in Coronal Mass Ejections

Abstract: The free energy that is dissipated in a magnetic reconnection process of a solar flare, generally accompanied by a coronal mass ejection (CME), has been considered as the ultimate energy source of the global energy budget of solar flares in previous statistical studies. Here we explore the effects of the aerodynamic drag force on CMEs, which supplies additional energy from the slow solar wind to a CME event, besides the magnetic energy supply. For this purpose we fit the analytical aerodynamic drag model of Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gold-Hoyle flux rope test: Highly twisted flux ropes with a large number of helical windings are thought to drive the expulsion of coronal mass ejections from a coronal flare site out to the heliosphere (Gold and Hoyle 1960). Such a highly twisted structure with 5 windings could be reproduced with the old VCA-NLFFF code (Aschwanden 2013a), while the new VCA3-NLFFF code could only produce magnetic field lines with less than a half winding turn (Aschwanden 2019), but this inability is consistent with the expected non-existence of nonlinear force-free field solutions at N twist > ∼ 1 due to the kink instability criterion. However, such Gold-Hoyle structures may exist as transients in interplanetary space, where force-freeness is not required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Gold-Hoyle flux rope test: Highly twisted flux ropes with a large number of helical windings are thought to drive the expulsion of coronal mass ejections from a coronal flare site out to the heliosphere (Gold and Hoyle 1960). Such a highly twisted structure with 5 windings could be reproduced with the old VCA-NLFFF code (Aschwanden 2013a), while the new VCA3-NLFFF code could only produce magnetic field lines with less than a half winding turn (Aschwanden 2019), but this inability is consistent with the expected non-existence of nonlinear force-free field solutions at N twist > ∼ 1 due to the kink instability criterion. However, such Gold-Hoyle structures may exist as transients in interplanetary space, where force-freeness is not required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 right panels), no matter how large the non-potential force-free α parameter (or b) is chosen, which implies that helical geometries with more than one full turn cannot be reproduced with the new VCA3-NLFFF code. The most likely explanation for this limit is that helical magnetic field lines with a twist of more than one turn are not force-free, as it is theoretially expected from the kink instability criterion Hood and Priest 1979;Török et al 2003;Kliem and Török 2006;Kliem et al 2014), as well as from observational evidence (N twist < ∼ 0.5) of the helical twisting number (or the Gauss braiding linkage number) of coronal loops in solar active regions (Aschwanden 2019). Helical flux ropes as envisioned by Gold and Hoyle (1960) may still exist in interplanetary space, but are transient and require a time-dependent solution of the non-forcefree magnetic field.…”
Section: Panel B Versus D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Future work may include STEREO data (Temmer et al 2010), which has a higher temporal cadence and spatial coverage in the lower corona (r < ∼ 3 R ⊙ ) that are occulted in coronagraphs like LASCO/SOHO. Coverage in this distance range is crucial to study acceleration and deceleration by the solar wind, by including aerodynamic drag effects (Cargill 2004;Vrsnak et al 2004Vrsnak et al , 2013Aschwanden and Gopalswamy 2019).…”
Section: The Cme Propagation Distance Dmentioning
confidence: 99%