2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2020)166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global electroweak fit and vector-like leptons in light of the Cabibbo angle anomaly

Abstract: The “Cabibbo Angle Anomaly” (CAA) originates from the disagreement between the CKM elements Vud and Vus extracted from superallowed beta and kaon decays, respectively, once compared via CKM unitarity. It points towards new physics with a significance of up to 4 σ, depending on the theoretical input used, and can be explained through modified W couplings to leptons. In this context, vector-like leptons (VLLs) are prime candidates for a corresponding UV completion since they can affect Wℓν couplings at tree-leve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such scenarios are particularly interesting as within recent years several hints for the violation of lepton flavour universality (LFU) have been acquired. These include τ → µνν/τ → eνν, τ → µνν/µ → eνν [54,55] and the Cabibbo angle anomaly [56][57][58][59], which can also be interpreted as a sign of LFUV [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. Furthermore, even though in this case also (small) couplings to bottom and strange quarks are necessary, Z bosons are among the prime candidates for explaining the discrepancies between the SM predictions and data in b → s + − transitions [12,34,51,53,67,.…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)068mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such scenarios are particularly interesting as within recent years several hints for the violation of lepton flavour universality (LFU) have been acquired. These include τ → µνν/τ → eνν, τ → µνν/µ → eνν [54,55] and the Cabibbo angle anomaly [56][57][58][59], which can also be interpreted as a sign of LFUV [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. Furthermore, even though in this case also (small) couplings to bottom and strange quarks are necessary, Z bosons are among the prime candidates for explaining the discrepancies between the SM predictions and data in b → s + − transitions [12,34,51,53,67,.…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)068mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another observable which has recently attracted attention (see for instance [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90]) and is of interest for the scenario under consideration is the sum of the squares of the absolute values of the first-row elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix:…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)122mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exotic leptons can mix with the SM Higgs boson [5] giving rise to a small splitting of the masses of the mutiplet members. Also, these couplings will give rise to dimension six operators with contribution to the SM observables [6,7] smaller than the dimension 5 operators, arising from compositeness, under consideration in the present work.…”
Section: Model Set-upmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Like in other models with exotic fermions [5] couplings to SM Higgs may be present. However, these interactions [6,7] result in weaker effects on the SM observables than the ones introduced through compositeness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%