Increasing evidence suggests that attention can concurrently select multiple locations; yet it is not clear whether this ability relies on continuous allocation of attention to the different targets (a ''parallel'' strategy) or whether attention switches rapidly between the targets (a periodic ''sampling'' strategy). Here, we propose a method to distinguish between these two alternatives. The human psychometric function for detection of a single target as a function of its duration can be used to predict the corresponding function for two or more attended targets. Importantly, the predicted curves differ, depending on whether a parallel or sampling strategy is assumed. For a challenging detection task, we found that human performance was best reflected by a sampling model, indicating that multiple items of interest were processed in series at a rate of approximately seven items per second. Surprisingly, the data suggested that attention operated in this periodic regime, even when it was focused on a single target. That is, attention might rely on an intrinsically periodic process.oscillation ͉ parallel vs. serial S elective attention denotes the ability to enhance processing of a particular location or object. In recent years a number of studies have suggested that multiple locations can be concurrently attended (1-6). In most of these cases, however, it is difficult to distinguish a true (i.e., sustained) division of the attentional spotlight, from a strategy in which a single attentional focus would switch rapidly between the different targets. Indeed, both strategies could explain the occurrence of classic ''set size effects'' (i.e., decreases of performance with increasing number of attended items) either because attention is a limited resource (''parallel'' strategy), or because the effective time that attention samples each object decreases when several objects must be attended (''sampling'' strategy). With respect to visual search tasks, in which a single target must be detected among a variable number of elements, this debate has divided the community for quite some time, with no accepted conclusion [Sternberg S (1973) in Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society in St. Louis, MO,. A similarly unresolved argument has been made regarding multiple-object tracking paradigms (15)(16)(17)(18).Here, we propose a quantitative strategy for distinguishing between these alternatives: The psychometric function for detection of a single target as a function of its duration can be used to predict the expected psychometric function for multiple targets, and the predicted shape is quite different for parallel and sequential strategies. We can thus determine which strategy best describes the performance of human observers with multiple attended items. The mathematical details of this method are given in supporting information (SI) Appendix, but the underlying idea can also be understood in simple terms. A ''probe'' event of variable duration must be detected by the observer (Fig. 1). When only a single location is cu...