2002
DOI: 10.1038/nn876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex

Abstract: The content of visual experience depends on how selective attention is distributed in the visual field. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans to test whether feature-based attention can globally influence visual cortical responses to stimuli outside the attended location. Attention to a stimulus feature (color or direction of motion) increased the response of cortical visual areas to a spatially distant, ignored stimulus that shared the same feature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

64
449
8
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(539 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
64
449
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is true that our conclusions obtained in a task requiring the sustained monitoring of a particular feature (contrast) at multiple static locations may not generalize to studies concerned with transient aspects of attention or to tasks requiring the sustained monitoring of multiple locations independent of featural information (e.g., multiple-object-tracking paradigms). Similarly, we address only spatial aspects of attention, whereas it is well known that some feature-based forms of attention can enhance the processing of a particular feature throughout the entire visual field, i.e., in a nonspatial way (26)(27)(28). It would seem, however, that even if the present results were shown to hold only for a very particular form of attention under specific experimental conditions, they would still provide a forceful challenge for current theories of attention, most of which are not equipped to explain our findings-with only a few exceptions (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that our conclusions obtained in a task requiring the sustained monitoring of a particular feature (contrast) at multiple static locations may not generalize to studies concerned with transient aspects of attention or to tasks requiring the sustained monitoring of multiple locations independent of featural information (e.g., multiple-object-tracking paradigms). Similarly, we address only spatial aspects of attention, whereas it is well known that some feature-based forms of attention can enhance the processing of a particular feature throughout the entire visual field, i.e., in a nonspatial way (26)(27)(28). It would seem, however, that even if the present results were shown to hold only for a very particular form of attention under specific experimental conditions, they would still provide a forceful challenge for current theories of attention, most of which are not equipped to explain our findings-with only a few exceptions (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this manner, red targets, for instance, could be processed preferentially throughout the visual field. Experimental evidence for this kind of biasing was found for color and luminance in macaque area V4 (Motter, 1994), for motion in macaque MT (Treue and Martinez Trujillo, 1999), and for color and motion in human V4 and MT (Saenz et al, 2002). …”
Section: Feature-based Attentionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additional evidence for the existence of spatially global feature-based attentional modulations was provided by fMRI and ERP studies in humans (Saenz, Buracas, & Boynton, 2002;Serences & Boynton, 2007;Zhang & Luck, 2009). In these studies, observers attended to a specific task-relevant feature in one visual field, and objects in the other unattended hemifield triggered enhanced visual responses when they matched the feature that was currently attended on the opposite side.…”
Section: Attentional Guidance and Feature-based Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%