Global economic productivity losses from vision impairment and blindness

Abstract

Background In the absence of accessible, good quality eye health services and inclusive environments, vision loss can impact individuals, households and communities in many ways, including through increased poverty, reduced quality of life and reduced employment. We aimed to estimate the annual potential productivity losses associated with reduced employment due to blindness and moderate and severe vision impairment (MSVI) at a regional and global level. Methods We constructed a model using the most recent economic, demographic (2018) and prevalence (2020) data. Calculations were limited to the working age population (15–64 years) and presented in 2018 US Dollars purchasing power parity (ppp). Two separate models, using Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross National Income (GNI), were calculated to maximise comparability with previous estimates. Findings We found that 160.7 million people with MSVI or blindness were within the working age and estimated that the overall relative reduction in employment by people with vision loss was 30.2%. Globally, using GDP we estimated that the annual cost of potential productivity losses of MSVI and blindness was $410.7 billion ppp (range $322.1 - $518.7 billion), or 0.3% of GDP. Using GNI, overall productivity losses were estimated at $408.5 billion ppp (range $320.4 - $515.9 billion), 0.5% lower than estimates using GDP. Interpretation These findings support the view that blindness and MSVI are associated with a large economic impact worldwide. Reducing and preventing vision loss and developing and implementing strategies to help visually impaired people to find and keep employment may result in significant productivity gains Funding MJB is supported by the Wellcome Trust (207472/Z/17/Z). JR's appointment at the University of Auckland is funded by the Buchanan Charitable Foundation, New Zealand. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health was supported by grants from The Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust, Moorfields Eye Charity (GR001061), NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, The Wellcome Trust, Sightsavers, The Fred Hollows Foundation, The SEVA Foundation, The British Council for the Prevention of Blindness and Christian Blind Mission. The funders had no role in the design, conduct, data analysis of the study, or writing of the manuscript.

Healthcare costs among patients with macular oedema associated with non-infectious uveitis: a US commercial payer’s perspective

“…Additionally, increasing vision loss resulted in progressively higher medical costs, ranging from $11 054 among patients with no indicator of visual loss to $53 767 among those with blindness. Not only does vision loss result in substantial medical costs, it also negatively affects quality of life, 20 21 increases the risk of physical and mental health comorbidities (eg, depression, stroke, premature death), 22 and decreases work productivity, 23 all of which contribute to the large burden of eye conditions like UME.…”

Identification of the Relationship between Hub Genes and Immune Cell Infiltration in Vascular Endothelial Cells of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Bioinformatics Methods

“…DR, especially proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), makes a relatively minor contribution to vision deprivation or blindness in working-age people in developed countries [ 3 ], and its prevalence has been increasing in some developing countries with large populations [ 4 , 5 ]. This has caused a heavy economic burden on all countries and has imposed serious obstacles to the development of global economic productivity [ 6 ].…”

Visual impairment and employment in Norway

“…People with visual impairment face great barriers in performing daily life activities and in social participation, with work participation being one of the greatest challenges [ 2 ]. Despite that many wants to work, the employment rate of people with visual impairment in Westernized countries are substantially lower relative to the general population [ 3 – 6 ], with a gap as large as 50 percent in some countries [ 3 ]. Furthermore, visual impairment has been associated with unfavourable conditions, such as poverty [ 7 , 8 ], underemployment [ 8 ], low work satisfaction [ 8 ], and early retirement from working life [ 9 ].…”