2009
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Drug Discovery: Europe Is Ahead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One corollary of these empirical studies is that the United States could be paying a disproportionately high share of global pharmaceutical R&D (McClellan, 2003), although this has been challenged elsewhere (Light and Lexchin, 2005;Light, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One corollary of these empirical studies is that the United States could be paying a disproportionately high share of global pharmaceutical R&D (McClellan, 2003), although this has been challenged elsewhere (Light and Lexchin, 2005;Light, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] Generally, NMEs are considered to be chemically novel drugs and biologics that have not been previously marketed in the United States. The pace of NME approvals since 2000 has been sluggish, raising questions about the state of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most OECD countries also spend more of their healthcare budgets on drugs than does the United States 13. Trump’s economic advisers fail to report that dollar for dollar, European researchers have developed more first-in-class and global drugs than US researchers 14. European investment in pharmaceutical research and development increased by 88% between 2000 and 2015 15…”
Section: Us System Failurementioning
confidence: 99%