1990
DOI: 10.1029/ja095ia09p15209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global disturbance of the transient magnetic field associated with thermospheric storm winds on March 23, 1979

Abstract: During large magnetic storms, wind disturbances produced by auroral phenomena can affect the whole thermospheric circulation and associated ionospheric dynamo currents for many hours after the end of the storm. This paper presents a morphological analysis of the ground magnetic field disturbance related to the storm winds observed on March 23,1979, the day after the Coordinated Data Analysis Workshop (CDAW) 6 events. The disturbance in the magnetic field variations is observed on a planetary scale, and its pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actions of largescale current systems, such as those related to the magnetospheric convection and to the ionospheric disturbed dynamo, through storm winds in the low thermosphere (Richmond and Matsuchita, 1975;Blanc and Richmond, 1980;Mazaudier, 1985;Mazaudier et al, 1985), have been pointed out in middle and low latitudes. Fambitakoye et al (1990) have studied the magnetic eects of the ionospheric disturbed dynamo. Interactions between those current systems and the EEJ would be one of the causes of the EEJ day-to-day variability (Mayaud, 1982;Mazaudier, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actions of largescale current systems, such as those related to the magnetospheric convection and to the ionospheric disturbed dynamo, through storm winds in the low thermosphere (Richmond and Matsuchita, 1975;Blanc and Richmond, 1980;Mazaudier, 1985;Mazaudier et al, 1985), have been pointed out in middle and low latitudes. Fambitakoye et al (1990) have studied the magnetic eects of the ionospheric disturbed dynamo. Interactions between those current systems and the EEJ would be one of the causes of the EEJ day-to-day variability (Mayaud, 1982;Mazaudier, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Richmond and Matshushita [1975] studied the thermospheric response to magnetic storms and later on, Blanc and Richmond [1980] first proposed the ionospheric disturbance dynamo to explain the electric field disturbance observed with the incoherent scatter sounder of Saint-Santin later after the end of storm and due to the dynamo action of storm winds generated by the auroral Joule heating [Blanc and Richmond, 1980;Fejer et al, 1983;Sastri, 1988;Fejer and Scherliess, 1995;Mazaudier and Venkateswaran, 1990;Fambitakoye et al, 1990;Fejer, 2002;Richmond et al, 2003].…”
Section: Ionospheric Disturbance Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many theoretical and experimental work, during these last decades, dealt with the direct penetration of the magnetospheric convection electric field from the polar region towards the equatorial latitudes (Wolf, 1970;Pellat and Laval, 1972;Senior and Blanc, 1984;Mazaudier et al, 1984;Spiro et al, 1988;Kobea et al, 2000;. In 1980, Blanc and Richmond observed the electric field disturbance, after the end of a storm, due to the dynamo action of storm thermospheric winds generated by auroral Joule heating, during the active phases of the storm and first proposed the ionospheric disturbance dynamo mechanism to explain this phenomenon (Fejer et al, 1983;Sastri, 1988;Fambitakoye et al, 1990;Mazaudier and Venkateswaran, 1990;Fejer and Scherliess, 1995;Fejer, 2002). The limited number of studies related to the disturbance dynamo mechanism, from the time of the work of Blanc and Richmond (1980) to those of Le Huy and Amory- Mazaudier (2005), confirm the complexity of the attempt to isolate ionospheric disturbed dynamo events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%