2018
DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Diabetes Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Real-World Impact on Incidence, Weight, and Glucose

Abstract: Real-world LSM strategies can reduce diabetes risk, even with small weight reductions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
149
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
149
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, the absolute benefit on diabetes prevention was higher in our study than in this meta-analysis (7.4% vs 4.0%, respectively) and so the NNT was lower (14 vs 25) [13]. Our findings compare well with the first efficacy studies, reporting 6.2-12% absolute risk reductions (NNT 16-8, respectively) [8,9], but are somewhat stronger than those of a meta-analysis of translational studies to prevent diabetes in high-risk populations other than South Asians (RR reduction, 29%; absolute risk reduction, 3%) [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of note, the absolute benefit on diabetes prevention was higher in our study than in this meta-analysis (7.4% vs 4.0%, respectively) and so the NNT was lower (14 vs 25) [13]. Our findings compare well with the first efficacy studies, reporting 6.2-12% absolute risk reductions (NNT 16-8, respectively) [8,9], but are somewhat stronger than those of a meta-analysis of translational studies to prevent diabetes in high-risk populations other than South Asians (RR reduction, 29%; absolute risk reduction, 3%) [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…From 2001, efficacy trials have documented a reduction in diabetes incidence in high-risk adults of up to 58% through lifestyle modification interventions incorporating a healthy diet and/or physical activity [8][9][10][11][12]. Recent meta-analyses of efficacy and pragmatic diabetes prevention trials found a 30-40% reduction in diabetes incidence [13,14]. However, none of these meta-analyses reported effects specifically for South Asians [13,14], although several lifestyle intervention trials, culturally adapted to suit the specific needs, cultural norms and values of the South Asian populations in different contexts, have been developed and tested [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed that each additional kilogram loss induced by lifestyle interventions was associated with 43% lower odds of type 2 DM. 121 Caloric restriction without malnutrition leads to increased longevity and delayed onset of age-associated disorders in rhesus monkeys. 122 Nutrition Fatty acids and carbohydrate intake.…”
Section: Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…prevention of type 2 diabetes in routine practice have demonstrated relative risk reductions in incidence of 26% and 29% (4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%