The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1504/ijbcrm.2020.105617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Global cybersecurity legislation' - factors, perspective and implications

Abstract: As at the time of this research, no globally adopted and unified legislation for cybersecurity exists that is currently operational, despite rife global clamours for such a legislative framework. This research paper synthesizes and reviews some of the key imposing factors, putting in perspective the surrounding realities that impede the successful actualisation of such a framework, using the qualitative-exploratory research methodology. Also, presenting the implications of these factors and associated realitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach to creating Homo virtualis is often criticized, as from the point of view of the person, the consciousness recorded on an external carrier cannot be fully called immortality, because it will only be only a copy of the individuality, but not the individuality per se or the personality a fortiori (Ogu et al, 2020). There are doubts about the possibility of the existence of an artificial intelligence capable of thinking equal to or superior to a human intelligence, because the computer acts algorithmically, consistently, and relying on mathematical laws; today, science knows about the continuity of the nervous system and that infinity is not algorithmic, which creates an endless field for creative and constructive human activity (Yoon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Homo Virtualismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach to creating Homo virtualis is often criticized, as from the point of view of the person, the consciousness recorded on an external carrier cannot be fully called immortality, because it will only be only a copy of the individuality, but not the individuality per se or the personality a fortiori (Ogu et al, 2020). There are doubts about the possibility of the existence of an artificial intelligence capable of thinking equal to or superior to a human intelligence, because the computer acts algorithmically, consistently, and relying on mathematical laws; today, science knows about the continuity of the nervous system and that infinity is not algorithmic, which creates an endless field for creative and constructive human activity (Yoon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Homo Virtualismentioning
confidence: 99%