2017
DOI: 10.1101/106542
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Cropland Connectivity: A Risk Factor for Invasion and Saturation by Emerging Pathogens and Pests

Abstract: The geographic pattern of croplands is an important risk factor for the invasion of crop-specific pathogens and arthropods, and saturation by endemic pests. Understanding the structure of cropland networks supports sampling and mitigation strategies. We evaluated global networks of key vegetatively-propagated crops (banana, cassava, potato, sweetpotato, and yam) of particular importance to food security in the tropics. The risk of damage from diseases transmitted through vegetative propagation is a particular … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can result in multiple and, perhaps, contrasting preferences that vary according to the user’s role within the food chain, implying that the input and decision‐making roles of different users is of primary importance in crop breeding. Breeding programs have historically focused on yield and disease resistance to face the challenges of food security in terms of feeding a growing population (Ceballos et al ., 2004; Manu‐Aduening et al ., 2006; Ojulong et al ., 2008; Ceballos et al ., 2020), and on malnutrition and safety issues (Adenle et al ., 2012; Peprah et al ., 2020; Xing et al ., 2020), with lower priority on post‐harvest quality characteristics, and processor and consumer demand. In addition, information on product characteristics is often overly simplified by not including information on the optimal range or description that would help breeder’s ability to meet user needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can result in multiple and, perhaps, contrasting preferences that vary according to the user’s role within the food chain, implying that the input and decision‐making roles of different users is of primary importance in crop breeding. Breeding programs have historically focused on yield and disease resistance to face the challenges of food security in terms of feeding a growing population (Ceballos et al ., 2004; Manu‐Aduening et al ., 2006; Ojulong et al ., 2008; Ceballos et al ., 2020), and on malnutrition and safety issues (Adenle et al ., 2012; Peprah et al ., 2020; Xing et al ., 2020), with lower priority on post‐harvest quality characteristics, and processor and consumer demand. In addition, information on product characteristics is often overly simplified by not including information on the optimal range or description that would help breeder’s ability to meet user needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users can evaluate the importance of nodes in their specific biophysical networks, and potentially include new analyses such as evaluating whether node demographic or other traits are associated with higher or lower importance for surveillance. Analyses such as evaluating the connectivity of host populations (Xing et al 2020), can be used to characterize landscapes for application with smartsurv. In on-going surveillance analyses, the importance of nodes could be updated as more information about the system becomes available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nodes might be groups of people (as hosts to human pathogens), farms, habitat patches, or other land management units. Links between nodes indicate the potential for the spread of undesirable species or genotypes, such as antibiotic resistant human or agricultural pathogens (Margosian et al 2009;Sutrave et al 2012;Xing et al 2020), or of desirable species or genotypes, such as endangered species or improved crop varieties (such as orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes to support Vitamin A consumption, e.g., evaluated in Andersen et al (2019)). In some cases, the same type of biophysical network model may usefully be applied to related abiotic processes, such as the spread of pollutants, soil erosion, and provisioning of fresh water (Baron et al 2002).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hub nodes (nodes with many links) and bridge nodes (nodes that connect distinct regions of a network) will tend to have important roles in the risk of disease spread, and in sampling and mitigation (Hernandez Nopsa et al 2015). However, nodes on the periphery of a network could be the entry point for an invasion of that network (Xing et al 2017). While the importance of hub and bridge nodes is intuitive, key roles of other nodes may be revealed in more detailed analyses of likely patterns of disease spread.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%