2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021ef002165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Cooling Hiatus Driven by an AMOC Overshoot in a Carbon Dioxide Removal Scenario

Abstract:  In CO2 removal experiment, change of global mean surface temperature was halted for 40 years during the early net-zero CO2 emission period. Cooling hiatus was driven by an excessive heat advection by a delayed and surpassed AMOC to CO2 forcing. AMOC overshoot is due to the salt advection feedback, amplified by enhanced salinity gradient and reduced oceanic stratification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the RND period, the eastern Pacific ITCZ shifts slowly to the north, and a higher surface pressure forms over the North Atlantic; this is related to the weakened Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC; An et al., 2021), and is a response to decreasing CO 2 radiative forcing (Figure 3a). The high pressure driven by the North Atlantic cooling during the RDN period intensifies mean southeasterlies (Figure S4a in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the RND period, the eastern Pacific ITCZ shifts slowly to the north, and a higher surface pressure forms over the North Atlantic; this is related to the weakened Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC; An et al., 2021), and is a response to decreasing CO 2 radiative forcing (Figure 3a). The high pressure driven by the North Atlantic cooling during the RDN period intensifies mean southeasterlies (Figure S4a in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a restoration period after the year 2280 was modeled, where the same CO 2 concentration as that in the PD simulation was maintained. Furthermore, the GMT in 2140, when the peak CO 2 concentration occurred, was approximately 5°C higher than in the PD simulation (Figure S1b in Supporting Information S1; An et al, 2021). Note that this study neglects anthropogenic aerosol emissions, which contribute to suppressed monsoon precipitation during the PD period (Hwang et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Community Earth System Model (Cesm) Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CO 2 pulse and CDRMIP experiments could provide a clue on a climate reversibility, which is an ability for restoring toward its initial climate state [19][20][21] . The opposite case refers irreversibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such irreversible climate change usually accompanies a hysteresis behavior. For example, a strong hysteresis behavior of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) could lead to an irreversible climate change 19,22,23 , and a strong oceanic thermal inertia over Southern Ocean could be a cause for irreversible climate change 21,24 . In this regard, the investigation of OHT gives a sense of where the irreversible climate change would occur by showing a place for the oceanic heat accumulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%