2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.093002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global constraints on muon-neutrino nonstandard interactions

Abstract: The search for new interactions of neutrinos beyond those of the Standard Model may help to elucidate the mechanism responsible for neutrino masses. Here we combine existing accelerator neutrino data with restrictions coming from a recent atmospheric neutrino data analysis in order to lift parameter degeneracies and improve limits on new interactions of muon neutrinos with quarks. In particular we re-consider the results of the NuTeV experiment in view of a new evaluation of its systematic uncertainties. We fi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9]) and with more phenomenological approaches, constraining their relative size with different experimental setups (see, e.g., refs. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). Although constructing (SU(2) L ×U(1) Y gaugeinvariant) models with large neutrino NSI and consistent with all current experimental constraints, mainly from charged-lepton flavor-violating processes, requires a certain amount of fine-tuning [9], they cannot be completely excluded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9]) and with more phenomenological approaches, constraining their relative size with different experimental setups (see, e.g., refs. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). Although constructing (SU(2) L ×U(1) Y gaugeinvariant) models with large neutrino NSI and consistent with all current experimental constraints, mainly from charged-lepton flavor-violating processes, requires a certain amount of fine-tuning [9], they cannot be completely excluded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NuTeV experiment measured ν µ (ν µ ) − q scattering, where ν µ andν µ were provided by the beamline at the Fermilab [70]. Since there is relatively large systematic errors, we take a conservative limit: [55,71], which is depicted by the light yellow region.…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)031mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that have constrained NSI with both oscillation and scattering experiments typically vary one or two NSI parameters when fitting to a given data set [16][17][18]. This is justifiable, considering that oscillation experiments are not able to distinguish between up/down type NSI, and specific experiments are most sensitive to only a small number of NSI parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%