2014
DOI: 10.35188/unu-wider/2014/732-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global collective action in health: The WDR+20 landscape of core and supportive functions

Abstract: Typescript prepared by Janis Vehmaan-Kreula at UNU-WIDER. UNU-WIDER gratefully acknowledges specific programme contributions from the governments of Denmark (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Danida) and Sweden (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency-Sida) for ReCom. UNU-WIDER also gratefully acknowledges core financial support to its work programme from the governments of Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) was established b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global financing is needed to catalyse the response for addressing the childhood cancer burden and for the production of global public goods, such as internationally accepted but contextually-sensitive guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and care; research for the development of effective and efficient care delivery models that coordinate affordable diagnostics, surgery, radiotherapy, medicines and palliative care; harmonized norms and standards for surveillance through development and strengthening of cancer registries in all countries; and, global data for comparative analysis and shared learning. 191 In most countries, domestic sources will provide most of the funding for scaling up services for better management of childhood cancers. The sources are most likely to be from public financing (government budget allocated to health, or health insurance), perhaps with complementary financing from health insurance.…”
Section: Financing For Global Scale Up Of Healthcare For Childhood Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global financing is needed to catalyse the response for addressing the childhood cancer burden and for the production of global public goods, such as internationally accepted but contextually-sensitive guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and care; research for the development of effective and efficient care delivery models that coordinate affordable diagnostics, surgery, radiotherapy, medicines and palliative care; harmonized norms and standards for surveillance through development and strengthening of cancer registries in all countries; and, global data for comparative analysis and shared learning. 191 In most countries, domestic sources will provide most of the funding for scaling up services for better management of childhood cancers. The sources are most likely to be from public financing (government budget allocated to health, or health insurance), perhaps with complementary financing from health insurance.…”
Section: Financing For Global Scale Up Of Healthcare For Childhood Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, improved data are needed to develop a clearer picture of how much money is currently going to providing which types of GPGs. As several researchers have pointed out, existing data collection systems are not well suited to identifying spending on GPGs and new methods of monitoring such information need to be developed (Blanchet et al ., 2013; Birdsall and Diofasi, 2014; Schäferhoff et al ., 2015). To gain some intuition on current financing levels one could begin by looking at some existing categories of GPGs.…”
Section: How To Govern the Financing And Production Of Gpgs For Health?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After succeeding in eradicating polio, India began to advise other countries in Asia and Africa that still struggle to control the disease. Bangladesh has also provided advice to control diarrhoeal diseases whereas the Aga Khan Development Network facilitates knowledge transfer in integrated primary and secondary care services in poor communities of south and central Asia and east Africa (Blanchet et al, ).…”
Section: Social Policy and The Aid Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are willing to impose high transactions costs on themselves, and most importantly on their recipient partners, to achieve tight control: accountability to donor electorates wins out over aid effectiveness. Riddell and Niño‐Zarazúa (forthcoming); Martínez Álvarez and Acharya () and Blanchet et al () show that the continuation of project aid is to a large extent because of donor governments' desire to track the effect of aid and show results to their constituencies, particularly in times of financial austerity.…”
Section: Sector and Budget Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%