“…A species' climate change vulnerability is inferred from differences between its recent distribution and its predicted potential future distribution in terms of extent, location and sometimes degree of fragmentation (e.g., Garcia, Araújo, et al, ), and also their degree of overlap (Huntley, Green, Collingham, & Willis, ). Correlative approaches have been used to predict species' potential distribution changes at various spatial scales (Pacifici et al, ), and have been widely applied to assess climate change vulnerability of plants (Fitzpatrick, Gove, Sanders, & Dunn, ; Midgley, Hannah, Millar, Rutherford, & Powrie, ; Thuiller, Lavorel, Araújo, Sykes, & Prentice, ), invertebrates (Harrison, Berry, Butt, & New, ; Heikkinen et al, ; Sánchez‐Fernández, Lobo, & Hernández‐Manrique, ; Settele et al, ) and vertebrates, including birds (Garcia, Burgess, Cabeza, Rahbek, & Araújo, ; Gregory et al, ; Hole et al, ), mammals (Hughes, Satasook, Bates, Bumrungsri, & Jones, ; Songer, Delion, Biggs, & Huang, ; Visconti et al, ), amphibians (Carvalho, Brito, Crespo, Watts, & Possingham, ; Lawler, Shafer, Bancroft, & Blaustein, ), and fishes (Jeschke & Strayer, ; Yu et al, ). We categorize methods for applying the correlative approach as climate envelope, regression‐based, machine learning and Bayesian, and describe available tools, data requirements and examples of their application (Table S4).…”