2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2013.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Climate Change and Despair: A Way Out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This minority position conflicts with the great majority of climate scientists around the world, who are convinced that the evidence for human-caused planetary global warming is overwhelming. 55 In May 2013, a study published in Environmental Research Letters analyzed the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11,944 climate abstracts from 1991-2011 matching the topics "global climate change" or "global warming." Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1 percent endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.…”
Section: The Other Sandy Islandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This minority position conflicts with the great majority of climate scientists around the world, who are convinced that the evidence for human-caused planetary global warming is overwhelming. 55 In May 2013, a study published in Environmental Research Letters analyzed the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11,944 climate abstracts from 1991-2011 matching the topics "global climate change" or "global warming." Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1 percent endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.…”
Section: The Other Sandy Islandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One US senator has called for an investigation into what he calls a "denial-for-hire" scheme in which, he alleges, fossil fuel corporations essentially purchase the opinion they prefer from ethics-challenged scientists. 66,67 This situation is beginning to resemble the tobacco controversies of the 1990s, in which "tobacco scientists" aligned themselves with the corporate interests of their masters who wrote their paychecks.…”
Section: New Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%