2015
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1104849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global citizenship incorporated: competing responsibilities in the education of global citizens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimizes the social and public dimensions in civic education: Mainstream GCE-TE literature promotes an “entrepreneurial self” able to respond to the neoliberal rational, with each individual responsible for themselves and the future for all (Arnold, 2016; Hartung, 2017; Peters, 2001) as a means of solving global problems (Romero & Estellés, 2019; Hartung, 2017). As previously shown, critical GCE scholars argue that mainstream discourses of GCE’s emphasis on self-determination and individualized active citizenship performs as a technology of subjection that minimizes the responsibilities of government and the public sphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minimizes the social and public dimensions in civic education: Mainstream GCE-TE literature promotes an “entrepreneurial self” able to respond to the neoliberal rational, with each individual responsible for themselves and the future for all (Arnold, 2016; Hartung, 2017; Peters, 2001) as a means of solving global problems (Romero & Estellés, 2019; Hartung, 2017). As previously shown, critical GCE scholars argue that mainstream discourses of GCE’s emphasis on self-determination and individualized active citizenship performs as a technology of subjection that minimizes the responsibilities of government and the public sphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the resolution of these global problems does not just depend on the global citizenship competence of the individuals and their cooperation (Held, 2016). But this narrative outsources the responsibility of solving those global challenges to autonomous individuals (in this case, individual educators), ignoring the incidence of other structural reasons (Hartung, 2017; Romero & Estellés, 2019). As Table 3 shows, the presence of the idea of GCE as a redemptive educational solution to global problems can be traced in almost half of the articles reviewed.…”
Section: Findings: Trends In Global Citizenship Education For Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be avoided by focusing on how the symbolic legitimacy of any political capital any children or adults accrue through the delegated authority of their institutional positions, can be distributed to enable dominated children and adults to exercise influence on issues that concern them. These findings have challenging relevance for the development of participation structures across Europe, but applying this learning would provide more optimistic futures (Hartung, 2015). The role of selective and hierarchical structures such as the TCP must be questioned as they perpetuate inequalities and act as mechanisms for 'ensuring that children will … internalise disciplinary aims and shape themselves in 11 accordance with expected social norms' (Raby, 2014, p. 81).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, focusing on a child structure, but drawing parallels with the Alvari adult structure, enables exploration of generation and other significant factors affecting children's influence in municipal decision-making. Through this analysis, we respond to Hartung's (2015) suggestion that academics should find new 'productive and optimistic' ways to engage with practice and policy assumptions about children's relationships to power and needs for citizenship education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El enfoque decolonial invita a problematizar el concepto en tanto puede estar favoreciendo una perspectiva de ciudadano principalmente eurocentrista, y a enfatizar en las particularidades socioculturales de cada contexto. Finalmente, el crítico/transformador pone el énfasis en la comprensión de las relaciones de poder y en la participación de los individuos para transformar las comunidades en búsqueda de la justicia social (ver una discusión más detallada sobre estos enfoques en Aguilar-Forero y Velásquez, 2018; Aktas et al, 2017;Hartung, 2017;Cho y Mosselson, 2017;Veugelers, 2011;Shultz, 2007).…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified