1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1096-7508(01)00035-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
156
0
19

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
156
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second place, retailer programmes may suffer from a weak environmental and social content, or, as is the case of the EUREPGAP programme for fruit and vegetables, an erosion of their content, as the sustainability standards lost much of their prominence during the last standard revision process in favour of food safety requirements. In the third place, retailer programmes, as previous research shows and our research confirms, may have discriminating effects on market access, especially for small producers (Henson & Loader 2001, Reardon et al 2001, Gibbon 2003, Dolan & Humphrey 2004, García Martinez & Poole 2004. These programmes typically seem to favour large-scale producers in developed as well as developing countries, because of the considerable investments in capital and human resources that are required for adaptation of the production operation.…”
Section: Consequences For the Governance System Of Food: Private Regusupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the second place, retailer programmes may suffer from a weak environmental and social content, or, as is the case of the EUREPGAP programme for fruit and vegetables, an erosion of their content, as the sustainability standards lost much of their prominence during the last standard revision process in favour of food safety requirements. In the third place, retailer programmes, as previous research shows and our research confirms, may have discriminating effects on market access, especially for small producers (Henson & Loader 2001, Reardon et al 2001, Gibbon 2003, Dolan & Humphrey 2004, García Martinez & Poole 2004. These programmes typically seem to favour large-scale producers in developed as well as developing countries, because of the considerable investments in capital and human resources that are required for adaptation of the production operation.…”
Section: Consequences For the Governance System Of Food: Private Regusupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, the rise of private actors in governance arrangements can also be explained from the viewpoint of economic interests, since regulatory initiatives may be used as a strategic instrument of competition (Reardon et al 2001). The latter argument touches upon the issue of power in economic relationships, an issue that is being studied in the context of global commodity chain analysis (GCCA) (see, for example, Gereffi 1999) and global value chain analysis (GVCA) (see, for example, Kaplinsky 2000).…”
Section: Governance and Value Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend is particularly recognizable in regions currently targeted by expansion strategies of retail corporations such as Eastern Europe and Asia. 7 Reardon et al (2001) report, for instance, that thousands of small dairy operations have gone out of business in the past five years in the extended Mercosur area, because the new quality and safety standards for milk and milk products implied large investments in equipment and buildings and coordination and management. Likewise, NGOs have pointed out that hundreds of thousands of small farmers in Africa are losing or will lose their living in the wake of the implementation of the GlobalGap standards (ActionAid 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…extension of governance to wider issues, such as management standards, environmental standards and, more recently, social standards that are observed by suppliers (Nadvi 2008, Nadvi K & Wältring 2004, Reardon et al 2001, Gibbon & Ponte 2005, Tallontire 2007, Hatanaka et al 2006). …”
Section: Reorganising Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%