2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global change impacts on river ecosystems: A high-resolution watershed study of Ebro river metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the published literature, very few studies have specifically reported rates during the winter or early spring from larger rivers (e.g., Escoffier et al., 2018; Marcarelli et al., 2010; Mejia et al., 2019; Uehlinger, 2006; Uehlinger & Naegeli, 1998; Uehlinger et al., 2000), but similar to headwater streams, most were not collected with the intent of exploring winter metabolism. Seasonal metabolism studies in large rivers tend to either occur in regions with infrequent or no ice cover during the winter season (e.g., Dodds et al., 2013; Hall et al., 2016; Hart, 2013; McTammany et al., 2003; Ochs et al., 2013; Roach et al., 2014; Smith & Kaushal, 2015; Sobotka & Phelps, 2017; Val et al., 2016) or exclude winter (e.g., O'Connor et al., 2012; Snyder & Minshall, 2005). Like for headwaters, studies that report winter metabolic rates in large rivers typically show that wintertime GPP is lower than other seasonal values (Hosen et al., 2019; Marcarelli et al., 2010; Uehlinger, 2006; Uehlinger & Naegeli, 1998).…”
Section: Ecological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the published literature, very few studies have specifically reported rates during the winter or early spring from larger rivers (e.g., Escoffier et al., 2018; Marcarelli et al., 2010; Mejia et al., 2019; Uehlinger, 2006; Uehlinger & Naegeli, 1998; Uehlinger et al., 2000), but similar to headwater streams, most were not collected with the intent of exploring winter metabolism. Seasonal metabolism studies in large rivers tend to either occur in regions with infrequent or no ice cover during the winter season (e.g., Dodds et al., 2013; Hall et al., 2016; Hart, 2013; McTammany et al., 2003; Ochs et al., 2013; Roach et al., 2014; Smith & Kaushal, 2015; Sobotka & Phelps, 2017; Val et al., 2016) or exclude winter (e.g., O'Connor et al., 2012; Snyder & Minshall, 2005). Like for headwaters, studies that report winter metabolic rates in large rivers typically show that wintertime GPP is lower than other seasonal values (Hosen et al., 2019; Marcarelli et al., 2010; Uehlinger, 2006; Uehlinger & Naegeli, 1998).…”
Section: Ecological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low flows generally enhance primary production through increased light availability and nutrient concentrations because of decreased dilution and increased substrate stability, as well as because of reduced shear stress on periphyton and enhanced macrophyte establishment (e.g., Acuña et al 2010, Marcarelli et al 2010, Val et al 2016). In the opposite response direction, floods generally result in decreased primary production because substrate stability decreases, causing higher turbidity that may reduce light conditions (e.g., Uehlinger 2000, Morgan et al 2006, Roberts et al 2007, Leggieri et al 2013, Val et al 2016. Furthermore, scouring reduces the abundance, biomass, and diversity of macrophytes and algae, especially periphyton (Riis and Biggs 2003, Wellnitz and Rader 2003.…”
Section: Similar Responses In Magnitude and Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 3 factors are also important determinants of algal and benthic assemblage structure (Poff et al 1990, Schofield et al 2004). Increased flow may enhance respiration through the input of organic matter, whereas the transport capacity of organic matter decreases during low-flow events (e.g., Roberts et al 2007, Val et al 2016. In other streams, a small reduction in respiration has been observed after floods, and an increase has been observed after droughts (Uehlinger et al 2003, Acuña et al 2004, Uehlinger 2006.…”
Section: Example 3: Hydromorphological Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water conservation function plays a crucial role in improving the hydrological conditions, regulating the water cycle, optimizing water quality and preventing sedimentation of rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Both human society and economic development depend on the ecosystem services provided by water resources, and their demands for water resources are increasing (Gleick, 2018; Liu et al, 2017; Montoya et al, 2016; Pedro‐MonzonĂ­s et al, 2015; Val et al, 2016). Climate change and land use are two main factors that affect the function of ecosystem services (Fu et al, 2015; Schröter et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%