2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00094-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global cerebral blood flow after CO2 inhalation in normal subjects and patients with panic disorder determined with []water and PET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panic patients exhibited a decrease in global CBF (gCBF) and stable pCO 2 -adjusted gCBF values in comparison with air and CO 2 inhalations, whereas normals exhibited stable gCBF and increasing pCO 2 -adjusted gCBF values [Ponto et al, 2002]. Recent SPECT and PET studies found abnormalities in temporal cortical and hippocampal areas of panic disorder patients [Bisaga et al, 1998;Bremner et al, 2000;Meyer et al, 2000].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panic patients exhibited a decrease in global CBF (gCBF) and stable pCO 2 -adjusted gCBF values in comparison with air and CO 2 inhalations, whereas normals exhibited stable gCBF and increasing pCO 2 -adjusted gCBF values [Ponto et al, 2002]. Recent SPECT and PET studies found abnormalities in temporal cortical and hippocampal areas of panic disorder patients [Bisaga et al, 1998;Bremner et al, 2000;Meyer et al, 2000].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both pharmacological and psychological methods have been used to examine anxiety in humans. These include pharmacological methods such as cholecystokinin tetrapeptide (CCK-4), lactate, carbon dioxide and pentagastrin induced anxiety (Benkelfat et al, 1995;Bellodi et al, 1998;Ponto et al, 2002;Bradwejn et al, 1995;Javanmard et al, 1999;Boshuisen et al, 2002;Zedkova et al, 2003;Zwanzger et al, 2003aZwanzger et al, , 2003b, and psychological (experimental) methods such as extemporaneous public speaking, aversive conditioning, fear-potentiated startle response, Stroop colour word task performance and anticipation of electric shock (Baas et al, 2002;Chua et al, 1999;Graeff, 2002Graeff, , 2003Grillon and Ameli, 2001;Grillon et al, 1991Grillon et al, , 1993aPalma et al, 1994;Reiman et al, 1989;Riba et al, 2001;Silva et al, 2001;Simpson et al, 2001;Tillfors et al, 2002). Recently, it has been shown that some of these models of experimental anxiety, particularly the fear-potentiated startle response are also sensitive to benzodiazepine anxiolytic agents (Zuardi et al, 1993;Patrick et al, 1996;Hellewell et al, 1999;Leite et al, 1999;Bitsios et al, 1999;Riba et al, 2001;Graeff, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy nonclinical samples have also played an important role in such research. They are used for comparative purposes when studying clinical populations to elucidate the nature and phenomenology of panic, including clarifying subtypes of panic attacks (Forsyth, Eifert, & Canna, 2000;Schmidt, Forsyth, Santiago, & Trakowski, 2002), biological and psychological vulnerabilities that may affect panic (Forsyth, Palav, & Duff, 1999;Gorman, Kent, Sullivan, & Coplan, 2004;Karekla, Forsyth, & Kelly, 2004;McNally & Eke, 1996;Ponto et al, 2002;, the effects of induced anxiety on cognitive processes (e.g., Hopko et al, 2003), and to study the role of fear conditioning in the etiology of anxiety disorders (Bouton, Mineka, & Barlow, 2001;Forsyth, Eifert, & Thompson, 1996;, to name a few.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%