1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global capacity reduction and schizophrenia

Abstract: This paper reviews the evidence for a specific deficit in the flow of information through the schizophrenic processing system. It is suggested that there is little to support the notion of a single defective mechanism underlying schizophrenic cognitive dysfunction. The lack of a valid and reliable metric for measuring degree of difficulty across tasks and a lack of concern with matching tasks for attentional processing load, detracts from the usefulness of available results. The applicability of a global limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our previous results, distraction interfered with the subjects' ability to shadow the relevant message, but it did not affect their subsequent recall of its content. Although the comparison of results across studies is complicated by a number of factors, the general pattern of results is perhaps most consistent with a suggestion made by Knight and Russell (1978), who argued that schizophrenics may suffer from a general reduction in the global capacity to process information. According to their argument, the specific manifestations of this global deficiency will vary as a function of task demands.…”
Section: Department Of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Universsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast to our previous results, distraction interfered with the subjects' ability to shadow the relevant message, but it did not affect their subsequent recall of its content. Although the comparison of results across studies is complicated by a number of factors, the general pattern of results is perhaps most consistent with a suggestion made by Knight and Russell (1978), who argued that schizophrenics may suffer from a general reduction in the global capacity to process information. According to their argument, the specific manifestations of this global deficiency will vary as a function of task demands.…”
Section: Department Of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Universsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In Factor 3, there appears to be such a trade-off between nonverbal memory and concept manipulation performance, evidenced by the negative factor loading of the nonverbal memory measure. Such a trade-off could be the result of reallocating limited processing capacity from one functional domain to another (Knight and Russell 1978; Gjerde 1983). In that sense, cognitive recovery may in part represent more efficient allocation of cognitive capacity in response to environmental demands.…”
Section: Can Cognitive Functioning Improve In the Chronic Residual Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from these studies have shown that distraction reduces the number of items that schizophrenic persons can recall, relative to their recall in a matched neutral condition, and are a clear demonstration of a specific vulnerability in the schizo-phrenic processing system. As such, these data represent a challenge to recent views that schizophrenic deficits are the product of a global reduction in attentional capacity (Gjerde, 1983;Knight & Russell, 1978). To reconcile these results with a generalized capacity-reduction account of cognition in schizophrenia, Gjerde (1983) has drawn a distinction between psychometric considerations such as discriminatory power, on the one hand, and amount of processing effort (Hasher & Zacks, 1979;Kahneman, 1973), on the other, and has concluded that those studies that have controlled for task difficulty level "have reported that schizophrenic dysfunction is most manifest when effortful processing is required" (p. 63).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although it has not been difficult to design tasks that uncover cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenic patients, demonstrating the specificity of such deficits to particular tasks or subgroups of patients has proved more frustrating (Knight & Russell, 1978). A methodological issue that undermined much of the work comparing the performance of schizophrenic patients on different tasks was first identified by Chapman and Chapman (1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%