2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Building Morphology Indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Python, those include for example the libraries Momepy 47 , GeoPandas 36 , Shapely 44 , PySAL 48 , and OSMnx 49 . One can also find relevant open-source code developed in other studies 37 , 50 . Refer to the documentation of these libraries for example of metrics and workflows.…”
Section: Usage Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Python, those include for example the libraries Momepy 47 , GeoPandas 36 , Shapely 44 , PySAL 48 , and OSMnx 49 . One can also find relevant open-source code developed in other studies 37 , 50 . Refer to the documentation of these libraries for example of metrics and workflows.…”
Section: Usage Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buildings share an intimate relationship with road networks, and are as much as networks, indicative of the hierarchical processes inherent in urban systems. On that note, the increasing availability and accessibility of large-scale, high-quality global building morphology indicators and footprints present unique opportunities to improve our multi-scalar understanding of complex urban networks (Biljecki and Chow, 2022). Another area for further research includes bridging gaps in data distribution and inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support other use cases, we provide an open source python package where users can generate euclidean buffers of arbitrary distance. As an example, building footprint proportion corresponds to the ratio between the building area and the buffered area around each node 19 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 Total Perimeter Yes Yes Decimal m 2 Tikhonova & Beirao 95 Mean Perimeter Yes Yes Decimal m 2 Litardo et al . 96 Perimeter St. dev Yes Yes Decimal m 2 Biljecki & Chow 19 Complexity Mean Yes Yes Decimal m 2 Basaraner & Cetinkaya 97 Complexity St. dev Yes Yes Decimal m 2 Labetski et al . 98 No.…”
Section: Data Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%