2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global budget of tropospheric ozone: Evaluating recent model advances with satellite (OMI), aircraft (IAGOS), and ozonesonde observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
118
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
12
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have no measure of how often the detached ozone intrusion reascends into the stratosphere, which would lead to a reduced stratospheric impact. The estimated tropospheric ozone columns modelled by GEOS-Chem may be biased; for instance, Hu et al (2017) suggest that in general GEOS-Chem (with GEOS-5 meteorological fields) underestimates STT, with ∼ 360 Tg a −1 simulated globally compared to ∼ 550 Tg a −1 observationally constrained. Transport uncertainty is very difficult to estimate with the disparate point measurements; it is possible that detected events are (at least partially) advected out of the analysis regions, which would mean we overestimate the influx into the region, and it is also possible that we are influenced by STT events outside the regions of analysis.…”
Section: Flux Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we have no measure of how often the detached ozone intrusion reascends into the stratosphere, which would lead to a reduced stratospheric impact. The estimated tropospheric ozone columns modelled by GEOS-Chem may be biased; for instance, Hu et al (2017) suggest that in general GEOS-Chem (with GEOS-5 meteorological fields) underestimates STT, with ∼ 360 Tg a −1 simulated globally compared to ∼ 550 Tg a −1 observationally constrained. Transport uncertainty is very difficult to estimate with the disparate point measurements; it is possible that detected events are (at least partially) advected out of the analysis regions, which would mean we overestimate the influx into the region, and it is also possible that we are influenced by STT events outside the regions of analysis.…”
Section: Flux Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Hu et al (2017) examined GEOS-Chem ozone simulations and found a similar overestimation of upper troposphere ozone in the mid-southern latitudes when using the GEOS5 meteorological fields. Figure 11 compares modelled (red) and observed (black) ozone profiles on 3 example days when STT events were detected using the ozonesondes.…”
Section: Simulated Ozone Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has been applied in a number of studies on global and regional tropospheric ozone Fiore et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Yan et al, 2016;Zhao et 140 al., 2017). A recent model evaluation with global tropospheric ozone datasets shows that GEOS-Chem (v10-01) provides an improved ozone simulation relative to previous model versions (e.g., v8-01 in Zhang et al, (2010)) with no significant seasonal and latitudinal biases (Hu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stratospheric Ozone Chemistry Is Represented By the Linearizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has been extensively evaluated against observations Evans and Jacob, 2005;Nassar et al, 2009;Mao et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Parrella et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2017). The model is driven by assimilated winds calculated by the Goddard Earth Observing System at a horizontal resolution of 4 • × 5 • , with 47 vertical levels from the surface to 50 hPa.…”
Section: Global Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%