2011
DOI: 10.1920/wp.cem.2011.3311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Bahadur representation for nonparametric censored regression quantiles and its applications

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ii under random censoring. Fortunately, such a result has been established by Theorem 4.3 of Kong et al (2013). To formally restate their result, let us introduce the following notations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…ii under random censoring. Fortunately, such a result has been established by Theorem 4.3 of Kong et al (2013). To formally restate their result, let us introduce the following notations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, in practice, a simple truncation can always be applied to ensure 0 ≤ S n (·|x, z) ≤ 1. See Spierdijk (2008) and Kong et al (2013) for a similar discussion.…”
Section: Random Censoringmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the future, we would also like to further explore this idea to other QR problems under memory constraints or in a distributed setup, e.g., 1penalized high-dimensional quantile regression (see, e.g., ; Wang, Wu and Li (2012) ;Fan, Xue and Zou (2016)) and censored quantile regression (see, e.g., Wang and Wang (2009) ;Kong, Linton and Xia (2013);Volgushev et al (2014); Leng and Tong (2014); Zheng et al (2018)).…”
Section: Bias and Variance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%