2019
DOI: 10.1145/3341617.3326137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Attraction of ODE-based Mean Field Models with Hyperexponential Job Sizes

Abstract: Mean field modeling is a popular approach to assess the performance of large scale computer systems. The evolution of many mean field models is characterized by a set of ordinary differential equations that have a unique fixed point. In order to prove that this unique fixed point corresponds to the limit of the stationary measures of the finite systems, the unique fixed point must be a global attractor. While global attraction was established for various systems in case of exponential job sizes, it is often un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key challenge is to prove the uniqueness and existence of the stationary point and the fact that all possible trajectories of the mean-field limit converges to this unique stationary point (global attraction) [6,33].…”
Section: Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key challenge is to prove the uniqueness and existence of the stationary point and the fact that all possible trajectories of the mean-field limit converges to this unique stationary point (global attraction) [6,33].…”
Section: Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show that the convergence can be extended to the stationary regime one also needs to establish global attraction of the fixed point. Global attraction is often proven using monotonicity arguments [5,21,24], but our multithreading models are not monotone (as the service time of a complete job does not necessarily have a decreasing hazard rate). We consider different scenarios for varying probe rates and the two stealing strategies, for N = 500 with µ 1 = 1, µ 2 = 2 and child job distribution p = [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]/15 ≈ [0.33, 0.27, 0.20, 0.13, 0.07].…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%