2012
DOI: 10.5194/amt-5-1761-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global and regional evaluation of over-land spectral aerosol optical depth retrievals from SeaWiFS

Abstract: Abstract. This study evaluates a new spectral aerosol optical depth (AOD) dataset derived from Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) measurements over land. First, the data are validated against Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) direct-sun AOD measurements and found to compare well on a global basis. If only data with the highest quality flag are used, the correlation is 0.86 and 72 % of matchups fall within an expected absolute uncertainty of 0.05 + 20 % (for the wavelength of 550 nm). The quality i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed validation of the global SeaWiFS AOD using the collocated v003 Level 2 products against cloud-screened and quality-assured Level 2 AERONET measurements (Holben et al, 1998;Smirnov et al, 2000) and other satellite products is presented for land in Sayer et al (2012a) and for ocean in Sayer et al (2012b). Briefly, on a global basis, over one standard deviation (68 %) of AOD matchups were found to agree within an absolute expected error of 0.03 + 15 % over ocean and 0.05 + 20 % over land at 550 nm.…”
Section: Satellite Data and Their Uncertainties For Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed validation of the global SeaWiFS AOD using the collocated v003 Level 2 products against cloud-screened and quality-assured Level 2 AERONET measurements (Holben et al, 1998;Smirnov et al, 2000) and other satellite products is presented for land in Sayer et al (2012a) and for ocean in Sayer et al (2012b). Briefly, on a global basis, over one standard deviation (68 %) of AOD matchups were found to agree within an absolute expected error of 0.03 + 15 % over ocean and 0.05 + 20 % over land at 550 nm.…”
Section: Satellite Data and Their Uncertainties For Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The over-land retrieval uses the "Deep Blue" algorithm [Hsu et al, 2004[Hsu et al, , 2006Sayer et al, 2012b], which is part of the MODIS processing. The accuracy of the AOD retrieval at 550 nm is reported to be 0.05 ± 0.2× (AERONET AOD) over land [Sayer et al, 2012b] and 0.03 ± 0.15× (AERONET AOD) over ocean [Sayer et al, 2012a].…”
Section: Seawifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between the PCs is well above 0.9 and those between the EOFs are mostly above 0.8 (Tables 1 and 2) for the two MODIS and MISR. The relatively lower correlation between SeaWiFS and the other data sets may arise from the AOD threshold value specified in its retrieval algorithm [Sayer et al, 2012b] and may be related to some particular regions and aerosol types as discussed in section 4.2.…”
Section: Analysis Of Aod Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosols are also linked to respiratory illnesses (e.g., Pope and Dockery, 2006) and meningitis epidemics (e.g., Deroubaix et al, 2013). Since the global aerosol distribution shows high spatial and temporal variability, many studies have developed aerosol retrieval algorithms utilizing both low Earth orbit satellite measurements (Hsu et al, 2004;Kim et al, 2007;Torres et al, 2007;Kahn et al, 2010;Lyapustin et al, 2011b;von HoyningenHuene et al, 2011;Wong et al, 2010;Bevan et al, 2012;Sayer et al, 2012;Levy et al, 2013) and geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite measurements (Knapp et al, 2002(Knapp et al, , 2005Wang et al, 2003;Urm and Sohn, 2005;Yoon et al, 2007;Kim et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2011;. These studies have typically adopted an inversion approach, using a precalculated look-up table (LUT) based on assumed aerosol optical properties (AOPs) to retrieve aerosol information from the measured visible reflectance at the top of the atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%