2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8181(00)00057-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global and regional anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
224
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
15
224
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing aerosol trend has been explained by SO 2 and soot emissions, with an increase in SO 2 emissions of 35% per decade over the same region (22). Anthropogenic SO 2 and soot emissions in Asia are most important for the regional aerosol budget in the winter months because coal is burned as a main source of heat and energy, whereas dust and boreal fire smoke contributions are minimal during the year (14,22). The regions in the remote marine troposphere typically contain lower levels of sea-salt and sulfate aerosols (5), as also depicted in the TOMS aerosol measurements during the period of 1984-1994 over the Pacific (SI Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing aerosol trend has been explained by SO 2 and soot emissions, with an increase in SO 2 emissions of 35% per decade over the same region (22). Anthropogenic SO 2 and soot emissions in Asia are most important for the regional aerosol budget in the winter months because coal is burned as a main source of heat and energy, whereas dust and boreal fire smoke contributions are minimal during the year (14,22). The regions in the remote marine troposphere typically contain lower levels of sea-salt and sulfate aerosols (5), as also depicted in the TOMS aerosol measurements during the period of 1984-1994 over the Pacific (SI Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We scaled the 1995-1999 values of the ABC forcing to the emission history of SO 2 (18) and BC (19) for India (see Fig. 1) and extrapolated it back in time to estimate the time history of the forcing from 1930 (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The aerosols emissions before 1930 were very small (18,19) for the South Asian region, and to save computational time, we started the PCM runs from 1930 onward. The results are not sensitive to the absolute values of the emission because we are scaling the emission to its value for 1995-1999.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first simulation uses pre-industrial (≈1870) emissions of aerosol particles and aerosol precursors. These include natural (Kettle and Andreae, 2000; Andres and Kasgnoc, 1998) and anthropogenic (Smith, et al, 2001(Smith, et al, , 2004 emissions of sulfur and soot from surface sources of biomass burning and fossil fuels (Ito and Penner, 2005), natural organic matter emissions based on a 9% conversion rate of the terpene carbon emissions from Guenther et al (2001) to organic matter (Penner et al, 2001), dust particles for the year 2000 (P. Ginoux, personal communication, 2004) generated using the algorithm of Ginoux et al (2001), and sea salt emissions generated internally in the model using the method of Gong et al (1997). The second uses natural and anthropogenic particle and precursor emissions for the present day (≈2000) for anthropogenic sulfur, anthropogenic soot from surface sources, and aircraft-generated soot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%