2004
DOI: 10.1021/jp037305v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Analytical Potential Hypersurface for Large Amplitude Nuclear Motion and Reactions in Methane II. Characteristic Properties of the Potential and Comparison to Other Potentials and Experimental Information

Abstract: The global analytical potential surface for the electronic ground state of methane developed in paper I is analyzed and discussed in detail. A new determination of the experimental potential surface for the CH chromophore in CHD 3 , obtained from more recently measured line positions and integrated absorption coefficients, is also reported. The complete, nine-dimensional calculation of the vibrational ground state by diffusion quantum Monte Carlo on the fully anharmonic potential surface allows the determinati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From this value, and estimated anharmonic zero point energies (Grev et al 1991), one obtains the zero kelvin reaction enthalpy D 0 = ∆ r H 0 • − = 432.63 kJ mol −1 , which agrees fairly well with the thermo-and photochemically determined value 432.9 ± 0.1 kJ mol −1 (Weitzel et al 1999). Marquardt and Quack (2004) show that zero point energy estimations based on anharmonic force fields may carry uncertainties on the order of 0.5-2 kJ mol −1 . The geometry optimized, absolute electronic energy of methane was calculated by Grev and Schaefer (1992) at the CCSD(T) level in an all electron calculation to be −40.501 E h , q which is roughly 0.06 aJ above a "realistic" value of (−40.514 ± 0.002) E h (Pople and Binkley 1975).…”
Section: Spectroscopy and Reaction Dynamics In The Ch 4 Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this value, and estimated anharmonic zero point energies (Grev et al 1991), one obtains the zero kelvin reaction enthalpy D 0 = ∆ r H 0 • − = 432.63 kJ mol −1 , which agrees fairly well with the thermo-and photochemically determined value 432.9 ± 0.1 kJ mol −1 (Weitzel et al 1999). Marquardt and Quack (2004) show that zero point energy estimations based on anharmonic force fields may carry uncertainties on the order of 0.5-2 kJ mol −1 . The geometry optimized, absolute electronic energy of methane was calculated by Grev and Schaefer (1992) at the CCSD(T) level in an all electron calculation to be −40.501 E h , q which is roughly 0.06 aJ above a "realistic" value of (−40.514 ± 0.002) E h (Pople and Binkley 1975).…”
Section: Spectroscopy and Reaction Dynamics In The Ch 4 Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that this resolution of a five decade long controversy starting with the paper by Coulson (1942) was obtained using IR intensities from the spectrum shown and combining this with numerous NIR intensity measurements and theoretical results in terms of a multidimensional electric dipole hypersurface (Hollenstein et al 1994, Marquardt and. We refer to the original papers for a more detailed discussion, leading to this now well-established result (see also Marquardt and Quack 2004). …”
Section: Ch 3 D Chd 3 and Ch 2 D 2 Under Collisional Broadening Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] led to an effective Morse parameter β ≈ 2 Å −1 , while the analysis of the anisotropy of the ab initio potential in Ref. [19] gave α ≈ 0.7-0.8 Å −1 (being close to the value of 1 Å −1 suggested long ago in Ref. [23]).…”
Section: Dissociation/recombination Studies In the Ch 4 ↔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples [13,14] Figures 5-7 illustrate experimental data and modelling results (full curves). The high-pressure limiting behaviour corresponds to a capture of H by CH 3 (for combination) on the potential energy surface of CH 4 (see Refs [15][16][17] and, for more details, see [18][19][20]). The low-pressure behaviour reflects the properties of collisional energy transfer on CH 4 -M potential energy surfaces (see Refs [21,22]).…”
Section: Dissociation/recombination Studies In the Ch 4 ↔mentioning
confidence: 99%