2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.85.018202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global analysis of exclusive kaon and pion electroproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from Refs. [17,35] are consistent with the kaon pole factor, −t/(t − m 2 K ) 2 , giving less enhancement than that of the pion. However, calculations predict a small maximum in the kaon cross section near t=0.1 GeV 2 due to the kaon pole [29,30].…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of Pion and Kaon Form Factorssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results from Refs. [17,35] are consistent with the kaon pole factor, −t/(t − m 2 K ) 2 , giving less enhancement than that of the pion. However, calculations predict a small maximum in the kaon cross section near t=0.1 GeV 2 due to the kaon pole [29,30].…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of Pion and Kaon Form Factorssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Nevertheless, detailed demonstration of the dominance of the kaon pole is required if one is to be confident in the extraction of F K . Current electroproduction data show that the t-dependence of the longitudinal kaon cross section is less steep than that of the pion [17,35]. These data include L/T separated cross sections up to photon energies of Q 2 =2.35 GeV 2 from Refs.…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of Pion and Kaon Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of F K was thus determined from a least squares fit of the Regge model prediction to the data. The transverse cross section is described well in shape, but underpredicted in magnitude, similar to what was observed for the transverse pion cross section [14,16,17,30]. Possible explanations and further work on the size of the transverse cross [20,27].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Pion electroproduction data were also obtained at DESY [14][15][16] for values of Q 2 of 0.35 and 0.7 GeV 2 , and longitudinal (L) and transverse (T) cross sections were extracted using the Rosenbluth L/T separation method. With the availability of the highintensity, continuous electron beams and well-understood magnetic spectrometers at JLab it became possible to determine L/T separated cross sections with high precision, and thus to study the pion form factor in the regime of Q 2 =0.5-3.0 GeV 2 [17][18][19][20]35]. The pion form factor has been compared with different empirical fits and model calculations based on pQCD, lattice QCD, dispersion relations with QCD constraint, QCD sum rules, Bethe-Salpeter equation, local quark-hadron duality, constituent quark model, holographic QCD, etc.…”
Section: Extraction Of the Pion Form Factor From World Datamentioning
confidence: 99%