2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global alpha-nucleus optical potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11). The same has been proved [13] to be true also for an enlarged systematics [78,79,80,81,82,85,86] discussed recently [23], and several data sets [83,87] lastly taken into account. The related incident-energy range can hardly explain the difference with respect to the same comparison just above A=60 (Fig.…”
Section: A≤54 Target Nucleisupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…11). The same has been proved [13] to be true also for an enlarged systematics [78,79,80,81,82,85,86] discussed recently [23], and several data sets [83,87] lastly taken into account. The related incident-energy range can hardly explain the difference with respect to the same comparison just above A=60 (Fig.…”
Section: A≤54 Target Nucleisupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The mass-dependences corresponding to nuclei with a nuclear asymmetry (N-Z)/A value of 0.1 are shown, while the complete formulas of the energies E 1 , E 2 , E 3 are given in Table 3. Table 1) angular distributions of the elastic scattering of α-particles at 25 MeV on 51 V, 53 Cr, 56,58 Fe, 59 Co, 63 Cu, 70,74,76 Ge, 76,78,80 Se, 94 Mo, 107 Ag and 112,124 Sn, divided by the Rutherford cross section, with OMP calculations by using either the present local parameter sets of Table 2 (solid curves), the regional parameter set in Table 3 (dash-dotted curves), or the global OMP parameter set of Kumar et al [23] (dotted curves). Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations