2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global alliance networks: A comparison of biotech SMEs in Sweden and Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social networks originate from sociology and, in a business context, refer to two or more connected business relationships, where an 'exchange' exists between business partners (Anderson, Hakansson, & Johanson 1994;Pitt et al 2006). The notion of a 'network' is based on the establishment of ties between individuals, groups of people, organizational departments or corporations, that leads to the creation of social networks (Wasserman & Faust 1994).…”
Section: Social Network Social Media and Snsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social networks originate from sociology and, in a business context, refer to two or more connected business relationships, where an 'exchange' exists between business partners (Anderson, Hakansson, & Johanson 1994;Pitt et al 2006). The notion of a 'network' is based on the establishment of ties between individuals, groups of people, organizational departments or corporations, that leads to the creation of social networks (Wasserman & Faust 1994).…”
Section: Social Network Social Media and Snsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Pitt et al (2006) and McCarthy et al (2007) used social network theory to examine internet links between B2B firms. Social networks are important for the survival of small firms, and critical in competing with larger businesses (Pitt et al 2006;Copp & Ivy, 2001). …”
Section: Social Network Social Media and Snsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the information resources existing in groups of firms with structural holes vary considerably, actors within each group tend to have access to the same and thus redundant sources of information. The entrepreneur brokering the flow of information between two groups has more bargaining power and can also control and exploit opportunities better than others (Pitt et al, 2006).…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social network theory (SNT) (Coleman, 1988;Granovetter, 1985) is one of the few theories that can be used in different levels of analysis such as individual, organization, and even country (Pitt, van der Merwe, Berthon, Salehi-Sangari, & Caruana, 2006). SNT defines a network as a set of objects (sometimes called actors, nodes, etc.…”
Section: Network Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and their relationships (sometimes called ties, links, etc.) (Pitt et al, 2006) in which: (1) actors and their actions have interdependence, not independence; (2) links between actors show the flow of tangible or intangible resources; and (3) the structure is a lasting pattern of relations that encourages or discourages actions (Wasserman & Faust, 1994). The main goal of SNT is to study the features of network structure, for example weak or strong ties (Granovetter, 1985), social capital (Coleman, 1988), and so forth, through mapping and professional analysis techniques (Fletcher, 2008;Wasserman & Faust, 1994).…”
Section: Network Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%