2017
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.16.01594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Abstract: The GAP score is a new pelvic-incidence-based proportional method of analyzing the sagittal plane that predicts mechanical complications in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. Setting surgical goals according to the GAP score may decrease the prevalence of mechanical complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiographic pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane is considered to be a crucial compensatory mechanism for subjects with sagittal malalignment and the maximal amount of pelvic tilt that a subject can perform is known to be limited by his maximal capacity of hip extension [15]. Moreover, rPT is an essential parameter that is used in different classifications of adult spinal deformity patients [24][25][26][27][28][29]44] and is known to be increased in this specific population whose quality of life is affected [15]. Thus, when the hip extension reserve is used, mobility of the pelvis might be limited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radiographic pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane is considered to be a crucial compensatory mechanism for subjects with sagittal malalignment and the maximal amount of pelvic tilt that a subject can perform is known to be limited by his maximal capacity of hip extension [15]. Moreover, rPT is an essential parameter that is used in different classifications of adult spinal deformity patients [24][25][26][27][28][29]44] and is known to be increased in this specific population whose quality of life is affected [15]. Thus, when the hip extension reserve is used, mobility of the pelvis might be limited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were enrolled in the study if their age was above 18 years and had no history of orthopedic surgery to either the spine, pelvis or lower limbs. The exclusion criteria were pain, including lower back pain at the time of the study or any musculoskeletal disease (scoliosis, Scheuermann's kyphosis or leg length discrepancies) or the presence of at least one radiological criteria of adult spinal deformity (based on the European and International Spine Study Groups [24][25][26][27][28][29]) or previous orthopedic surgeries. A written informed consent form was signed by each subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we did not investigate the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score, which can denote 'normal' and 'pathologic' standing sagittal alignment and shape as a single score for every magnitude of pelvic incidence. 33) In the GAP, the optimal sagittal alignment is based on four factors deviating from their ideal curves and these factors are proportionally related to the PI. 34) Therefore, future studies should describe the SSB by measuring a single variable, such as the GAP score, rather than listing several different variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score takes care of all these parameters, and is a useful tool for planning. 23 …”
Section: Spino-pelvic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%